The Absolute Monarchy in Russia, particularly under tsars like Peter the Great and Catherine the Great, became famous for its centralization of power and significant territorial expansion. These rulers implemented sweeping reforms to modernize the state, military, and economy, often adopting Western European styles and practices. Additionally, their reigns were marked by the establishment of a strong autocratic rule, where the monarch wielded absolute authority over the state and its people, often leading to both cultural flourishing and social unrest. The legacy of this period is characterized by a complex interplay of modernization and oppression.
Usually, the absolute monarch dictates the law and then it is the law.
The king or queen.
The power of the French monarchy was significantly increased by Louis XIV, often referred to as the "Sun King." His reign from 1643 to 1715 marked a period of absolute monarchy, where he centralized power and diminished the influence of nobles. By establishing a strong administrative system and promoting the arts, he reinforced the authority of the monarchy and made France a dominant power in Europe. His famous statement, "L'état, c'est moi" ("I am the state"), epitomizes his absolute control.
In an absolute monarchy, laws are typically made solely by the monarch who holds absolute power and authority over the government. The monarch may consult with advisors or a council, but ultimately has the final say in creating and implementing laws without the need for approval from a legislative body.
The decisions are the responsibility of the monarch, but usually the monarch has advisors. Talleyrand (France) was one of those advisors, for example.
Because it's the fastest, with no time lost to discussions when there is a decision to be made.
Marie de Médicis, as regent for her son Louis XIII of France, exemplified aspects of absolute monarchy through her centralized authority and control over the royal court. Her reign (1610-1643) sought to strengthen the monarchy by consolidating power, managing state affairs, and navigating complex political alliances. Despite her efforts, her inability to fully suppress noble opposition and internal conflicts highlighted the challenges of her rule. Ultimately, her regency played a significant role in shaping the foundation for the later absolute monarchy under Louis XIV.
there have been many types of government. but i guess the top are democracy-by the people for the people direct democracy-direct decisions made by the people monarchy-supreme power or sovereignty held by a single person. absolute monarchy-a monarchy that is not limited or restrained by laws or a constitution. limited monarchy-a monarchy that is limited by laws and a constitution. dictatorship-a country, government, or the form of government in which absolute power is exercised by a dictator. federalism-the federal principle of government. totalitarian-someone has total control
The National Assembly of France completed the drafting of the constitution in 1791.Its main objective was to limit the powers of the monarch.These powers instead of being concentrated in the hands of one person, were now seperated and assigned to different institutions- The Legesliature, The Executive and The Judiciary.This made France a constitutional monarchy.
Kremlin in Moscow The winter palace in Saint Peterburg
William the Conqueror established a form of governance that laid the groundwork for a strong centralized monarchy in England, but he did not embody absolute monarchy in the modern sense. His rule was characterized by a feudal system where power was distributed among nobles who held lands in exchange for loyalty and military service. While he wielded significant authority and made sweeping changes, including the Domesday Book for taxation and land management, he still relied on the support of his barons and the Church, indicating a more complex relationship between monarchy and feudal obligations.
Both monarchy and constitutional monarchy are systems of governance where a monarch serves as the head of state. In a traditional monarchy, the monarch holds absolute power and their authority is often derived from divine right or hereditary succession. In contrast, a constitutional monarchy limits the monarch's powers through a constitution or legal framework, allowing for a democratic system where political decisions are made by elected representatives. While both systems maintain a royal figure, the key difference lies in the distribution of power and the role of the monarchy in governance.