0
What else can I help you with?
Who holds hearings to examine any Supreme Court nominees qualifications and judicial philosophies?
The Senate Judiciary Committee
How does the senate judiciary committee influence the supreme court?
The Senate Judiciary Committee plays a crucial role in the nomination process for Supreme Court justices. It holds confirmation hearings for nominees, where they are questioned about their qualifications and views. The committee's recommendation, through a vote, can influence whether a nominee is confirmed. Additionally, the committee can affect the court through its oversight responsibilities, such as holding hearings on judicial actions or policy matters related to the court.
What are the constitutional requirements to hold office in the Judicial Branch?
The Constitution sets no specific requirements for nominating judges and justices to the Judicial Branch, or constitutional courts established under Article III. However, members of Congress, who often recommend potential nominees, and the Department of Justice, which reviews nominees' qualifications, have developed their own informal criteria.
How does the senate judiciary influence the supreme court?
They hold the hearings to determine the nominees of the Supreme Court. There have been six nominees that the senate has rejected over the past sixty years through this process.
Does the American Bar Association help select a US Supreme Court justice?
The American Bar Association issues an opinion about the professional competence and qualifications of US Supreme Court nominees and potential nominees.
What type of questions does the judiciary committee asked nomineet?
The judiciary committee typically asks nominees questions related to their legal philosophy, interpretation of the Constitution, and past judicial decisions. They may also inquire about the nominee's views on key legal issues, such as civil rights, criminal justice, and executive power. Additionally, questions may cover the nominee's professional background, ethics, and any potential conflicts of interest. The goal is to assess the nominee's qualifications and suitability for the judicial position.
True or false The qualifications for the president are more strict that for the vice president?
No, the official qualifications are the same, since the Vice President may become President. However, parties may not demand so much from their vice-presidential nominees as they do from their presidential candidate and voters might expect less.
What is the article 11 section 9 of the Philippine constitution?
The ombudsman and his deputies shall be appointed by the president from a list of at least six nominees prepared by the Judiciary and Bar Council, and from a list of three nominees for every vacancy thereafter. Such appointments shall require no confirmation. All vacancies shall be filled within three months after they occur.
What is the judicial nomination process?
The judicial nomination process involves the President of the United States selecting candidates for federal judgeships, including those for the Supreme Court. The nominees are then reviewed by the Senate Judiciary Committee, which conducts hearings to evaluate their qualifications and judicial philosophies. Following the hearings, the committee votes to recommend or oppose the nomination, and the full Senate then votes to confirm or reject the nominee. If confirmed, the nominee is appointed to the position by the President.
Are the qualifications for a US Supreme Court justice the same for the President?
No. The Constitution doesn't list any requirements for Supreme Court nominees; the appropriate qualifications are left to the President and Congress to determine, and have evolved over the years. There is no "natural born" citizen or minimum age mandate, either.
All the nominees for Oscars 2010?
The nominees are announced later this morning
Are the steps for picking a federal judge legal requirements or customary?
A combination of the two. Article II of the Constitution specifies the President appoints federal judges and justices with the "advice and consent" of the Senate, which must approve the nomination by a simple majority of 51% of the Senators voting to confirm the appointment. The Constitution is silent on other aspects of the process, such as how nominees are identified and screened, and what qualifications are required for consideration. It also makes no provision for the Senate Judiciary Committee or its confirmation hearings.
