Progressivism
You spelled it correctly: distrust.
And Distrust It was created in 1995.
I distrust the government.
A Healthy Distrust was created in 2004.
The Spartans and Athenians had conflicting political systems and values, leading to mutual distrust and animosity. Sparta was a militaristic society that prioritized discipline and collective strength, while Athens valued democracy, culture, and individual expression. Their rivalry intensified during the Peloponnesian War, where competing interests and alliances further fueled their dislike for one another. This fundamental clash of ideologies contributed to a long-standing tension between the two city-states.
For the most part, citizens of every nation have a degree of distrust with regards to their governments. Many times this mistrust is exaggerated. US citizens are not oppressed and they have political friends in each of the two main parties. Also the US has a good number of lessor known parties such as the Libertarian Party, to name just one of them.
It takes six different letters to spelll distrust, but two of them are used twice. I don't know why you would distrust my story.
Two syllables in distrust (dis-trust)
Distrust spoils a relationship
1. A hesitation to deploy US forces to troubled regions (especially over-seas) 2. A distrust of the US government by it's own citizens
Lobbying can provide several advantages, including the ability to influence legislation, raise awareness about specific issues, and represent diverse interests in the political process. It can facilitate informed decision-making by providing lawmakers with expert information and perspectives. However, disadvantages include the potential for undue influence by wealthy interests, which can lead to unequal representation and undermine democratic processes. Additionally, lobbying can contribute to public distrust in government if perceived as corrupt or overly secretive.
Many U.S. citizens were opposed to the Second Bank of the United States because they believed it concentrated too much economic power in the hands of a few wealthy individuals and institutions, which they felt undermined democracy. Critics argued that the bank favored elite interests over those of ordinary citizens, particularly farmers and laborers, who faced difficulties in accessing credit. Additionally, there were concerns about the bank's influence on politics and its role in financial crises, leading to widespread distrust and calls for its charter not to be renewed. This opposition was a significant factor in the broader populist movements of the time.