What problems might result from a direct democracy?

Answer 1

The more people you have in a direct democracy, the harder it becomes to get them all in the same room at the same time to find out how they all vote. For large groups, you then get into polling and mail-in ballots, which is very time-consuming and hard to organize, as well as creating opportunities for fraud. And it is harder to involve everybody and keep them informed. You can broadcast a debate on television, but there is no guarantee that everybody who will be voting is watching your debate. It is also true that large groups of people seem inevitably to include large numbers of fools, who are going to vote in an unwise manner. While this is also a problem of representative democracy, it seems to be an even greater problem with direct democracy. The majority may rule, but there is no guarantee that they will do so with any wisdom.

Answer 2

Direct democracy can be impractical if a population is too large. Typically, direct democracy works best when the population is smaller because in a large population it is more difficult to come to a consensus. There is also the argument that citizen-legislators are not well versed in law-crafting and may create a bad law with a bad outcome and unintended consequences.

Answer 3

The main problem that results from a direct democracy is that it can quickly devolve into mob rule. This means that the majority will simply vote rights or equality away from minorities and become tyrannical towards the minority.

Answer 4

The biggest problem with a direct democracy is that the rights of the minorities may be taken away in the process.

Answer 5

The rights of the minority may be taken away. Under the republic form in the US, a majority should not be able to subvert the rights of a minority, but it has repeatedly occurred.

Answer 6

which one of the following problems may result from a direct democracy