UNTRUE statements about countries... let's see...
Statements that are not true about how enjoyable a job might be:All jobs are the same in terms of whether or not they are enjoyable. (untrue)The pay rate determines how enjoyable a job will be; the higher the pay, the more enjoyable it is. (untrue)The lowest pay means being miserable in the job. (untrue)If you think a job is not enjoyable, then everyone will think the same way. (untrue)Only unskilled or uneducated workers would find enjoyment in simple jobs. (untrue)Employers should pay the highest pay to do unenjoyable tasks. (untrue)
Publishing classified information, making untrue statements (libel) or the classical "Shouting FIRE in a crowded theater".
This is not an issue for sensible comment as it would expose one to a charge of libel. If you are concerned by any of his statements which you think are untrue you could write to him or a newspaper with your refutation.
A Presbyterian lie would be any untrue statement presented by someone claiming to represent one of the Presbyterian denominations. In the same sense, a Baptist or Roman Catholic or Lutheran or Episcopalian or Mormon lie would be any untrue statement presented by persons claiming to represent one of those denominations. No single religious group can be more or less identified with lies (false statements) than any other religious group.
By not fighting Speak calmly and don't shout. Listen to each other without interrupting. Make statements about how you feel about what the other person has done or said, but do not accuse them or call them names. This is called making 'I' statements. For example, instead of saying "You're a *%#&! liar," you say, "I felt hurt when I found out that what you told me was untrue. I would like you to be honest with me."
You cannot sue former employers simply for giving bad references. However, you can sue them if they outright lie about major things, for example claim that you were a thief or an alcoholic. You would then be able to sue them for defamation or slander if you can prove that the statements are untrue.
Defamation includes making false and derogatory accusations against someone, either directly or implicitly (innuendo). It includes such statements both when made orally (slander) and in writing (libel). It is unlawful to publish defamatory statements, so it would be impossible to legally give real examples. However, since it is impossible to defame a fictional character, it would not be defamatory to say that Lord Greystoke was raised by apes, since that would be true, but it would be defamatory to say that he was a cannibal, since that is not only untrue but also derogatory (it would expose him to contempt or ridicule).
Ida B. Wells would most likely disagree with statements that downplay or deny the existence of systemic racism and the historical injustices faced by African Americans, particularly regarding lynching and civil rights. She would also challenge any assertion that suggests that the oppression of Black individuals is a thing of the past or that equality has been fully achieved. Furthermore, she would likely oppose statements that dismiss the importance of activism and social reform in combating racial inequality.
To determine which statement is false regarding prenatal exposure from the field trip, I would need the specific statements to evaluate and compare them against the information discussed. Please provide the statements, and I can help identify the false one.
A prefix is the part that comes before (pre means before). The prefix is un. It comes before the word true. Un means not. Untrue means not true. The prefix is very imortant to the meaning of this word.
The opposite of remaining true would be being false or untrue.
Colonies could buy goods from other countries besides the mother country. Colonies would ship raw materials to the mother country.