Before their move to democracy, many of these countries had authoritarian or autocratic forms of government. This can be attributed to various reasons, such as historical factors, colonial legacies, power dynamics, and political ideologies.
In some cases, these countries might have been under colonial rule, which often had authoritarian structures in place that were not conducive to democratic governance. Additionally, some countries experienced prolonged periods of Dictatorship or one-party rule due to power struggles or ideologies like communism.
Furthermore, factors like weak institutions, corruption, and socio-economic disparities can contribute to the prevalence of autocratic regimes. In such situations, leaders may consolidate power and suppress opposition to maintain control, preventing the establishment of democratic systems.
Before, Athenian democracy was put into place, it was ruled by the Tyrant's in a Tyrannical government. Okay guys, my answer might not be the best but, it got me an A on my paper! I hope this answer helps you! If not, I'm sorry!!
A government in which people elect delegates to make laws is a Representative Government. A Democracy could be representative or direct.
Jan Vavra told in Czech radio 08-15-2017 that democracy in East European countries might have reached its limits and must be reformed. I am telling that it is not a problem of only East European countries.
The USA is the only current one I know of, although Canada might be one. Also the Roman Empire was a republic, and I think the Romans started the Republic government; like Greece created democracy.
The Egyptian people have kicked out there government because they wanted democracy, and they will probably will get it but 3rd world countries might not be able to offer democracy so if everyone keeps trying to kick there own government out of power which they should rightly do so then there will be a world war and the world will be in an economic crisis then the world will literally be over. It is impossible for the hole world to be in democracy because there are lots of people who support dictators and so on.
That might be a definition of a theoretical model of democracy, but I don't believe it is operative anywhere in the world at this time.
Because, assuming they are able to govern themselves, democracy empowers the people to rule and it should work.
By not having a government based on Religion has improved their economies of North Africa and the other countries that are there.
There are quite a few disadvantages of a democracy. One disadvantage of a democracy is that you might not get what you want.
what devices mght be used to widen a democracy?
because you might need change the spots before.
Plato believed democracy led to mob rule and instability due to the ignorance of the masses. Aristotle feared that in a democracy, the majority might oppress the minority and that it could be easily manipulated by demagogues. They both favored the rule of a philosopher king or a virtuous elite as a more stable form of government.