answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Which country had a revolution the led the rise of democracy?

France and the United States both had significant conflict leading to more democratic political orders and societies. In England, democracy evolved out of the unwritten constitution and various acts of Parliament over the years- there was no revolution


What political party was the union army?

The US Army is and always has been non-partisan. While individual members, the soldiers, may have a party affiliation or preference, soldiers take orders. Orders cannot be followed if they are questioned. And partisanship leads to questions. Regardless of the political party affiliation of the Commander in Chief, he is the CIC.


In the history of Ancient Rome was a democracy or dictatorship better?

simple question and the answar is democracy. democracy the normal people had a voice and say in things. dictarorship 1 guy is giving orders


There are two sub-orders of carnivores members of Pinnipedia have flippers By definition what do members of Fissipedia all have?

Paws


How do you use the word democracy in a sentence?

Our founding fathers tried to make our democracy fair and equal. Aristotle believed that excessive democracy would lead to mob rule. Neither an army or a business can be a democracy, as both follow the orders given by their leaders.


In which political system must all orders be obeyed?

communism.


Do you all have to receive holy orders?

No, not all members of the clergy are required to receive holy orders. In some religious traditions, such as Buddhism or some sects of Protestantism, clergy members may not undergo a formal ordination process. It ultimately depends on the specific beliefs and practices of a particular religion.


Why did the roman's want a republic?

The political thinking of the time was that the Romans never wanted to be subject to the whims and orders of a one man rule. They established the republic to avoid this and to give the people a voice in how they were governed. This concept is reflected in the USA which has since creation been a republic rather than a democracy.


Why are executive orders controversial?

Executive orders are controversial because they allow the president to enact significant policy changes without the need for congressional approval, which can undermine the system of checks and balances fundamental to U.S. democracy. Critics argue that this concentration of power can lead to overreach and the bypassing of legislative debate. Additionally, executive orders can create uncertainty, as they may be easily reversed by subsequent administrations, leading to inconsistent policy implementation. This dynamic can polarize political discourse and challenge the stability of governance.


What sort of political principles guided the creation of the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut and the Mayflower Compact?

Pilgrim @


Can cabinet members veto a President's decision?

Not in the United States. Cabinet members are appointed by the President to follow his orders. The most drastic thing they can do is to resign in protest.


What agreement extended voting rights to non church members?

It's called the Fundamental orders of Connecticut