militia
France and the United States both had significant conflict leading to more democratic political orders and societies. In England, democracy evolved out of the unwritten constitution and various acts of Parliament over the years- there was no revolution
The US Army is and always has been non-partisan. While individual members, the soldiers, may have a party affiliation or preference, soldiers take orders. Orders cannot be followed if they are questioned. And partisanship leads to questions. Regardless of the political party affiliation of the Commander in Chief, he is the CIC.
simple question and the answar is democracy. democracy the normal people had a voice and say in things. dictarorship 1 guy is giving orders
Paws
Our founding fathers tried to make our democracy fair and equal. Aristotle believed that excessive democracy would lead to mob rule. Neither an army or a business can be a democracy, as both follow the orders given by their leaders.
communism.
No, not all members of the clergy are required to receive holy orders. In some religious traditions, such as Buddhism or some sects of Protestantism, clergy members may not undergo a formal ordination process. It ultimately depends on the specific beliefs and practices of a particular religion.
The political thinking of the time was that the Romans never wanted to be subject to the whims and orders of a one man rule. They established the republic to avoid this and to give the people a voice in how they were governed. This concept is reflected in the USA which has since creation been a republic rather than a democracy.
Executive orders are controversial because they allow the president to enact significant policy changes without the need for congressional approval, which can undermine the system of checks and balances fundamental to U.S. democracy. Critics argue that this concentration of power can lead to overreach and the bypassing of legislative debate. Additionally, executive orders can create uncertainty, as they may be easily reversed by subsequent administrations, leading to inconsistent policy implementation. This dynamic can polarize political discourse and challenge the stability of governance.
Pilgrim @
Not in the United States. Cabinet members are appointed by the President to follow his orders. The most drastic thing they can do is to resign in protest.
It's called the Fundamental orders of Connecticut