it wasnt
"Scramble for Africa"
European imperialism was motivated by a desire for economic gains in both regions.
Imperialism
Imperialism in Asia, Africa, and Latin America led to significant social, political, and economic consequences. Colonized regions experienced exploitation of their resources and labor, often resulting in economic dependency and disruption of local economies. Additionally, imperialism imposed foreign governance and cultural systems, leading to loss of sovereignty and identity for indigenous populations. The legacy of imperialism continues to affect these regions today, contributing to ongoing challenges such as inequality and political instability.
Imperialism did not end all at once everywhere in Africa, but European colonization of Africa was disrupted by WW II, and following WW II there were a series of wars of independence which brought an end to European colonialism.
European Imperialism played a horrifying role in Africa. When Europe discovered Africa's mineral wealth, they enslaved the peoples, believing themselves better.
The military was involved in European imperialism in Africa by controlling unrest and protecting the citizens. Without their assistance, many European countries would have suffered significant loses due to attacks from locals.
"Scramble for Africa"
it had its roots in european imperialism in africa
There was no European countries ruling the land in 1850
yes
Europeans used military force