Of course, it makes a huge difference if this globally consistent set of laws is well designed, fair, and based on democratic principles, rather than being arbitrary and dictatorial. Just because the whole world would have one consistent set of laws, does not in itself make the world better or worse, but a good quality set of laws, especially if the laws were accompanied by some effective method of law enforcement (since the best laws in the world will be useless if they are not enforced) could do a tremendous amount of good, by creating legal mechanisms for non-violent resolution of conflicts, by making global commerce much easier, by giving people more secure and peaceful lives, by eliminating the rampant government corruption that presently exists in most parts of the world, and so forth.
It could be argued that the world should not really have one consistent set of laws because different populations in different locations have different needs, different traditions, different problems etc., and they need to have laws that are tailored to their particular situation, but I don't personally believe that. A well designed body of law would work well for everybody, even though some people would doubtlessly need some time to get used to the idea.
But it is also true that if the laws are badly designed or badly enforced, then all you would be doing is creating a horrible and oppressive global tyranny. So this scheme could work very well or very badly, depending upon how it was done.
"...While there are advantages to an unwritten constitution, the disadvantages include no limitations on the legislative body, an unclear division of the powers of government and the possibility of devolution."
She now owns 15 countries this is from barnaby
China does not govern Japan. They are two different countries and have different government systems.
The base word of government is govern.
It was difficult for some newly independent African countries to govern themselves as they had already developed some dependency. As a matter of fact, most African countries still struggle to manage their affairs as a nation.
There is only disadvantage. The best choice is to set up an entire group of buildings, perfectly designed to be the state capital, in a large campus within the city. The state government doesn't need an entire city to govern the state.
French Polynesia. Hope this helps!!
The regulations that govern drinking water are different for different countries. In the United States, drinking water must be purified and kept clean.
Salutary neglect was a British colonial policy that allowed the American colonies considerable freedom to govern themselves, which fostered economic growth and encouraged a sense of autonomy. The advantages included the development of local governance and trade practices that benefitted the colonies. However, the disadvantages included a growing disconnect between the colonies and Britain, leading to tensions and eventual conflict as the colonies began to resist British authority and demand greater independence. This laid the groundwork for revolutionary sentiments that culminated in the American Revolution.
Ethnicity does not affect one's ability to govern.
national origins act
The waycongress planned to govern the Northweat Territory differ fomr the way Spain and other European countries governed their Amercian territory, was that the congress