if the consuls could not decide on a matter then the dictator would be chosen and would rule for a short period of time
I think you mean Dictator. The Romans would appoint a dictator only in times of crisis and when the problem was solved, the Dictator was expected to step down from his office. However, five years was usually the maximum amount of time. that the senate would give out to a Dictator. Julius Caesar was the exception.
The temporary postition that the Roman senate would appoint in times of war was the dictator. When the crisis was over, or when the time of his appointed term was over, the dictator was expected to give up his power.
The institution of the office of dictator in the ancient Roman republic had the best way to act quickly in an emergency and avoid the possible delays of working with the Senate or the Assembly. The danger in the supreme power of the dictator was that should he make an error, it might be too late to remedy the situation as the Senate and Assembly would not have been consulted before the dictator's actions took place.
Senate
If Ceasar had ruled as "dictator for life", the senate would have lost their power; Rome would no longer be a democracy. Furthermore, the last dictator they had before Ceasar was the cruel King Tarquin, who ruled 450 years earlier. The thought of another dictator scared many Romans. =D
No, a dictator could not just take power. He had to be appointed by the senate before he could assume power. The position of dictator was a legitimate office under the Roman republic and was only granted by the senate.
When Caesar ordered the Senate to declare him dictator for life. But this is not quite true. Caesar never ordered the senate to declare him dictator for life, the senate did it on its own. Although this honor contributed to the people's fears that he would become a king, the actual event that triggered the immediate action of the conspirators was the offering of a crown to Caesar at the Lupercalia festival. Even though Caesar refused the crown, it was widely believed that he was not sincere.
Caesar sent different men to the senate to replace himself or represent his interests at different times. For example, the first triumvirate, which consisted of Caesar, Pompey and Crassus. Crassus and Pompey were in Rome looking after Caesar's (and their own) interests. When Caesar became dictator and was away from the city, he, as dictator would appoint a Master of the Horse, who was the official who acted in place of a dictator in the city of Rome. Mark Antony and Lepidus were two of them.
i would choose knuckles cause scourge raped her
Well he was declared dictator, tried to dissolve the senate and eventually was murdered by a few senators including Brutus. So i would say they disliked him.
Some members of the senate would be very likely to lead the opposition to Caesar because his repetitive dictatorships crippled the principle of the Roman Republic. Now the senate itself gave Caesar the dictatorships and the honors, but all the senators did not agree and were outvoted.Caesar wanted to stabilise Rome's broken system of government and stop civil war, so he established himself as dictator for 10 years, then for life. The constitution allowed a dictator for 6 months to fix things.
Some members of the senate would be very likely to lead the opposition to Caesar because his repetitive dictatorships crippled the principle of the Roman Republic. Now the senate itself gave Caesar the dictatorships and the honors, but all the senators did not agree and were outvoted.Caesar wanted to stabilise Rome's broken system of government and stop civil war, so he established himself as dictator for 10 years, then for life. The constitution allowed a dictator for 6 months to fix things.