Since the reign of Charles I of England, Britain has been a constitutional monarchy. All Kings and Queens before Charles had ABSOULTE power, meaning they had complete control over their people. Since King Charles I had an extremely large fall out with the government and parliament, Britain has been controlled by it's parliament, with the Queen acting merely as a figure head.
They wanted to shift to Presidency/Government.
France's transition to a constitutional monarchy, established during the French Revolution, granted the king limited powers defined by a constitution. While the monarch retained authority over certain areas, such as the executive branch and military matters, his decisions were subject to the approval of a legislative assembly. This arrangement aimed to balance royal authority with the principles of representative government, thereby reducing the absolute power previously held by the king. Ultimately, it marked a significant shift toward a more democratic governance structure in France.
Dictatorship. Although with the recent uprisings in northern Africa and all, the government might have a shift in power very soon.
When did the balance of power in the U.S. federal system shift in favor of the national government having more power?
The royal house can change during significant events such as the death or abdication of a monarch, which may lead to the accession of a new monarch from a different branch of the royal family. Changes can also occur through dynastic marriages that unite or separate royal houses. Additionally, constitutional reforms or the declaration of a new royal house can result in a shift in royal lineage and title.
Democratic shift refers to a change in governance towards a more democratic system, typically characterized by greater political participation, representation, and decision-making power for the population. This can occur through various mechanisms such as electoral reforms, citizen movements, or constitutional changes.
The Glorious Revolution occurred in 1689 and was a shift of political power from the British Monarchy to Parliament. The Monarchy remains the central focus of the government, but Parliament assume much of the power of the finances and the ability to pass laws.
After Santa Anna came to power in the 1830s, he effectively nullified the Mexican Constitution of 1824, which had established a federalist system. He centralized power and imposed a more authoritarian regime, leading to the dissolution of federalism in favor of a centralized government. This shift sparked significant unrest and contributed to conflicts such as the Texas Revolution, as many regions opposed his centralized control and the abandonment of constitutional governance.
it helped shift the power to the pesants and make a democrocy
Constitutional monarchies differed from previous absolute monarchies by limiting the powers of the monarch through a constitution or legal framework, which established the rule of law and often included a separation of powers. Unlike earlier governments where the king or queen had unchecked authority, constitutional monarchies typically incorporated representative bodies, such as parliaments, to involve citizens in governance. This shift marked a transition towards more democratic principles and accountability in leadership, reflecting Enlightenment ideas about individual rights and governance.
A) the shift of power from Portugal to Brazil
After the 17th century, the power of monarchs in Europe began to shift significantly due to the rise of constitutionalism and the decline of absolute monarchy. Events like the English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution led to the establishment of parliamentary systems that limited royal authority. Meanwhile, the Enlightenment fostered ideas of individual rights and governance, prompting challenges to monarchs' unchecked power. This period ultimately laid the groundwork for modern democracy and the idea of government accountability.