The importance of the head of state versus the head of government often depends on the political system in place. In parliamentary systems, the head of government (e.g., the Prime Minister) typically holds more executive power and is crucial for day-to-day governance. Conversely, in presidential systems, the head of state (e.g., the President) may also serve as the head of government and wield significant authority. Ultimately, their importance can vary based on the specific context and structure of each country's government.
Mississippi state
Africa does not have a head of state. Africa is not a country. It is a continent. It has more than 50 countries in it. Each of those countries would have their own head of state.
my head
Connecticut is basically a rich state small, good goverment and wonderful lifes.
Running for state senate is not as important as running for governor, because the governor is head of the state however running for the federal senate is a more important position than being governor.
the goverment
Yes, nobody that stupid should be in the goverment.
Because the president is the head of country. The prime minister is the boss of other ministries (by the way, the head of the government).
jarkhand
In 2003, the head of state varied by country. For example, in the United States, George W. Bush served as president. In the United Kingdom, the head of state was Queen Elizabeth II. If you have a specific country in mind, please specify for a more detailed answer.
they are more important, so its more work
Federal Democratic Republic of NepalPresident as head of the state and Prime Minister as head of the government.Read more: Special:Contributions