0
In general their is no one top agent in the policy process. That said, if we look at TARP Paulson and ?Bernake? were the only two people in the room so to speak. TARP is a very bad example though, because none of the leading policy theories allow for such a short term process or such a vast information gap. If we can consider the president as part of the legislative process as opposed to an executive agent, i would say legislators are the principal actors. This would be especially true if we only view the 'old' Iron triangle: Legislature, Executive agency, Industry.
What else can I help you with?
How would you describe the principal-agent model of relationships?
The principal-agent model involves a principal delegating tasks or decision-making to an agent to act on their behalf. The challenge arises from the divergence of interests between the principal and agent, leading to potential conflicts, information asymmetry, or moral hazard. Incentive alignment mechanisms, such as contracts or monitoring, are typically used to mitigate these issues and align the agent's actions with the principal's objectives.
What is the term for the entity that an agent represents regarding contractual agreements with third parties?
The term for the entity that an agent represents in contractual agreements with third parties is called the "principal." The agent acts on behalf of the principal, carrying out tasks and making decisions within the scope of authority granted by the principal. This relationship is foundational in agency law, where the agent owes fiduciary duties to the principal.
What is the principal-agent problem in economics and how does it impact decision-making within organizations?
The principal-agent problem in economics refers to the conflict of interest that arises when a principal (such as a company owner or shareholder) delegates decision-making authority to an agent (such as a manager or employee) who may not always act in the best interest of the principal. This can impact decision-making within organizations as agents may prioritize their own interests over those of the principal, leading to moral hazard, shirking, or other forms of opportunistic behavior that can harm the organization's performance and overall success.
How do you sign as Power of Attorney?
Disclose your identity as an agent whenever you act for the principal by writing or printing the principal's name and signing your own name as "agent" in the following manner: (Principal's Name) by (Your Signature) as Agent, or (Your Signature) as Agent for (Principal's Name).
What are the implications of the principal-agent problem in economics on decision-making and efficiency within organizations?
The principal-agent problem in economics refers to the conflict of interest that arises when a principal (such as a company owner) delegates decision-making authority to an agent (such as a manager) who may not always act in the best interest of the principal. This can lead to moral hazard and adverse selection, where the agent may prioritize their own interests over those of the principal. In organizations, this can result in inefficient decision-making, as agents may not always make choices that maximize the principal's welfare. This can lead to a lack of accountability, reduced motivation, and potential agency costs. To address this issue, organizations may implement mechanisms such as performance incentives, monitoring, and clear communication to align the interests of principals and agents and improve decision-making efficiency.
What are the causes of principle agency problems?
Principal-agent problems arise when there's a conflict of interest between a principal (e.g., shareholders) and an agent (e.g., management) tasked with acting on the principal's behalf. Key causes include differing objectives, where the agent may prioritize personal goals over the principal's interests, and information asymmetry, where the agent possesses more information about the situation than the principal. This misalignment can lead to inefficiencies and suboptimal decision-making. Additionally, lack of proper incentives or monitoring mechanisms can exacerbate these issues.
What is a substituted agent?
Sub-agent and substituted agent: The general rule is that an agent cannot delegate his authority and appoint another agent. (Delegatus non potest delegare). An agent being delegate cannot transfer his authority or duties to another. As per Section 190, an agent cannot lawfully employ another to perform acts which he has expressly or impliedly undertaken to perform personally unless by the ordinary custom of trade a sub-agent may or from the nature of the agency, the agent must be appointed. According to Section 191, a "sub-agent" is a person employed by and acting under the control of the original agent in the business of agency. The relation of the sub-agent and the original agent is as between themselves that of the agent and the principal. Where a sub-agent is properly appointed, the principal is so far as regards third parties represented by the sub-agent and is bound by and responsible for acts as if he were an agent originally appointed by the principal. The agent is responsible to the principal for the acts of the sub-agent. The sub-agent is responsible for his acts to the agent, but not to the principal except in case of fraud or wilful wrong. (Section192) There is no privity of contract between the sub-agent and the principal and, hence, sub-agent is not directly responsible to the principal except in cases of fraud or wilful wrong. If the sub-agent is properly appointed, the principal is liable to third parties for the acts of the sub-agent. If the sub-agent is appointed without proper authority, the principal is not represented by or responsible for the acts of the sub-agent and sub-agent is not responsible to the principal. As between the agent and the sub-agent, the relationship is that of the principal and agent and the agent is responsible for the acts of such sub-agent and both to the principal and to third parties (Section 193). Substituted agent: Where an agent holding an express or implied authority to name another person to act for the principal in the business of the agency has named another person accordingly, such person is not a sub-agent, but an agent of the principal for such part of the business of agency as is entrusted to him. (Section194). Where the agent has authority to appoint an agent and the person so appointed is in the nature of a substitute for the original agent, the contract arises between the principal and the substitute and the substituted agent becomes responsible to the principal for the due discharge of the duties as if he is appointed by the principal himself. According to Section 195, in selecting substituted agent for his principal an agent is bound to exercise the same amount of discretion as a man of ordinary prudence would exercise in his own case; and if he does so, he is not responsible to the principal for acts or negligence of the substituted agent so selected. Sub-agent and substituted agent: The general rule is that an agent cannot delegate his authority and appoint another agent. (Delegatus non potest delegare). An agent being delegate cannot transfer his authority or duties to another. As per Section 190, an agent cannot lawfully employ another to perform acts which he has expressly or impliedly undertaken to perform personally unless by the ordinary custom of trade a sub-agent may or from the nature of the agency, the agent must be appointed. According to Section 191, a "sub-agent" is a person employed by and acting under the control of the original agent in the business of agency. The relation of the sub-agent and the original agent is as between themselves that of the agent and the principal. Where a sub-agent is properly appointed, the principal is so far as regards third parties represented by the sub-agent and is bound by and responsible for acts as if he were an agent originally appointed by the principal. The agent is responsible to the principal for the acts of the sub-agent. The sub-agent is responsible for his acts to the agent, but not to the principal except in case of fraud or wilful wrong. (Section192) There is no privity of contract between the sub-agent and the principal and, hence, sub-agent is not directly responsible to the principal except in cases of fraud or wilful wrong. If the sub-agent is properly appointed, the principal is liable to third parties for the acts of the sub-agent. If the sub-agent is appointed without proper authority, the principal is not represented by or responsible for the acts of the sub-agent and sub-agent is not responsible to the principal. As between the agent and the sub-agent, the relationship is that of the principal and agent and the agent is responsible for the acts of such sub-agent and both to the principal and to third parties (Section 193). Substituted agent: Where an agent holding an express or implied authority to name another person to act for the principal in the business of the agency has named another person accordingly, such person is not a sub-agent, but an agent of the principal for such part of the business of agency as is entrusted to him. (Section194). Where the agent has authority to appoint an agent and the person so appointed is in the nature of a substitute for the original agent, the contract arises between the principal and the substitute and the substituted agent becomes responsible to the principal for the due discharge of the duties as if he is appointed by the principal himself. According to Section 195, in selecting substituted agent for his principal an agent is bound to exercise the same amount of discretion as a man of ordinary prudence would exercise in his own case; and if he does so, he is not responsible to the principal for acts or negligence of the substituted agent so selected.
How Do you resign as a medical power of attorney?
An agent may resign by giving notice to the principal, to the guardian if the principal is incapacitated and one has been appointed for the principal, and to any co-agent, or if none, the next successor agent.
Weather a principal can cancel the general power attorney with out giving notice to the agent?
A principal can certainly cancel the general power of attorney without giving notice to the agent, but if notice is not given the agent might continue to act upon the principal's behalf. If the agent does continues to act without being told he shouldn't his actions for the Principal will still be effective against the Principal and the agent will not be held to have done anything wrong. The problem is that the agent will be acting with "apparent authority", which will be just as binding on the Principal as if the POA had never been revoked.
Who is the principal for whom a real estate broker works?
A real estate broker has only one fiduciary duty and that is to his or her client, also known as the principal. Real estate agents act as the broker's representatives -- always. In every part of a real estate transaction, he or she is the broker's agent. Therefore, despite the fact that the agent may have procured the client, he or she did so as the broker's representative. Therefore, the only principal for whom a broker works is the client -- the home buyer or seller.
What are the key responsibilities and duties of both the principal and agent in a typical principal-agent relationship?
In a typical principal-agent relationship, the principal is responsible for giving instructions and providing resources to the agent to carry out tasks on their behalf. The agent is responsible for acting in the best interest of the principal, following their instructions, and keeping them informed of progress and any issues that arise. Both parties have a duty to act in good faith and with loyalty towards each other.
What is the difference between sub-agent and co-agent?
Section 191 of Indian Contract Act 1872 defines that "a sub-agent is a person employed by, and acting under the control of, the original agent in the business of the Agency." A sub-agent may be a properly appointed one or an improperly appointed one. Where an agent, having authority to do so, appoints a sub-agent, he is known as a sub-agent properly appointed (sec. 192.) Where an agent without authority appoints a sub-agent, he is called a sub-agent improperly appointed. ( sec. 193.)When a sub-agent is properly appointed, he can represent the principal as regards to third parties. There is no privity of contract between the sub-agent and the principal. The agent would be responsible to the principal for the acts of the sub-agent. In case of a fraud or willful wrong, the sub-agent is also directly responsible to the principal.When the sub-agent is improperly appointed, the principal is not bound by the acts of the sub-agent. The agent would be responsible to the principal and third parties.A "Co-agent" or a "substituted Agent" is a person who is appointed by the agent to act for the principal in the business of agency with the consent of the principal.Section 194 enacts, "where an agent holding an express or implied authority to name another person to act for the principal, names another person accordingly, he is not a sub-agent, but a substituted agent for the principal"
