yes
No it did not.
No it did not.
Parliament's Declaratory Act
There is but one entrenched law in the UK constitution, That the monarch may not be a catholic, however there are no others because we have an unwritten constitution and laws can be easily changed. However, the rule is that no parliament can bind its successor also applies, but this is more a limitation on what laws can be applied, not a law in itself.
It would be possible depending on the details. For example, the current trustee could execute a valid lease on behalf of the trust. If a successor trustee was appointed, the trust would still be subject to the terms of that lease so the successor trustee would be obliged to honor it.
5679 successor
According to Peano's axioms, in either system, it is the successor to the successor to the successor to the successor to the successor to 0.
his successor was Khufu
The Stamp Act Congress convened in New York in October 1765. The colonists were able to persuade Parliament to repeal the Stamp Act, but on that same day, Parliament also passed the Declaratory Act. This act proclaimed Parliament's ability "to bind the colonies in all cases whatsoever." The message was clear: Under no circumstances could Parliament abandon in principle its right to legislate for the 13 colonies. This right included taxation. This act allowed Britian to govern and bind the colonies whenever and for what ever they wanted, without any repercussions. When this was passed the colonialists became more angry and resistent toward England.
Galba's successor was Otho.
sorry i do not no the answer cant find anywhere