because the british officials wanted to sell grain outside of america, but the colonists believed that trading outside of america was bad and could truly harm their already weak economy.
Correct, they had no representation in government.
the authority to govern belonged to the colonists
Who had the final authority over the colonists, royal governors, colonial legislatures, citizens themselves, the English monarch
The declaration illustrates the colonists fighting for their conscience by asserting their inherent rights and the moral justification for rebellion against oppressive authority. It emphasizes that when a government violates fundamental rights, citizens have the duty to resist and establish a new system that reflects their values and freedoms. This act of defiance against expected respect for authority underscores the colonists' commitment to individual liberty and self-governance, prioritizing their conscience over blind allegiance. Ultimately, the declaration embodies their struggle for autonomy and moral integrity in the face of tyranny.
I dont really know
The fundamental orders of Connecticut and the Mayflower compact were early simple forms of government. The fundamental orders of Connecticut is a form of the Constitution. The people in the colony of Connecticut were provided a representative government that allowed colonists to be elected and help in the decision of key issues or on laws/regulations.
potatoes
No, the Fundamental Constitution of the Carolinas as abandoned in 1693 and replaced by a new form of government that took away power of the proprietors over the colonists.
They began to question the authority of the church leaders.
it inspired them to challenge Great Britain's authority
Ejkuwk
English colonists and the Wampanoag differed significantly in their cultures, lifestyles, and worldviews. The colonists, primarily from Europe, brought agriculture, Christianity, and a desire for land ownership, often prioritizing expansion and settlement. In contrast, the Wampanoag were Indigenous people with a deep connection to the land, practicing a communal lifestyle and engaging in subsistence agriculture, hunting, and fishing. These fundamental differences led to varying approaches to land use and governance, ultimately contributing to tensions between the two groups.