Locke argues that an absolute monarch is in conflict with his subjects because such a ruler operates without the consent of the governed, undermining the social contract that legitimizes authority. This lack of mutual agreement leads to a disconnect between the monarch's interests and the welfare of the people. Consequently, subjects may resist or rebel against a ruler who does not protect their natural rights, resulting in inherent conflict. Locke emphasizes that legitimate governance must be based on the consent of the people to ensure peace and stability.
John Locke
jhon locke was a phylosopher and a writter who during the french revolution wrote a book "Two Treaties of Government".locke sought to refute the doctrine of the divine and absolute right of the monarch.
It differed: Hobbes-absolute monarchy Locke-social contract
Hobbes supported absolute monarchy, while Locke supported the idea of popular sovereignty
Dictatorship=)
In the education of children, Locke discouraged the study of several subjects. These areas include: music, poetry, fencing and painting.
John Locke, in his Two Treatises of Government, sought to refute (go against) the doctrine of the divine and absolute right of the monarch. He also wanted a society based on freedom and equal laws and rights entitled to all citizens. He, like many philosophers of his time, wanted the formation of a French nation state.
John Locke opposed absolute monarchy as a form of government. He believed in the idea of limited government that respects individual rights and is based on the consent of the governed. Locke's ideas were influential in the development of modern liberal democracies.
he was not very happy about it and decided to make up a new form of government.
Supporters of absolute monarchy largely rejected John Locke's ideas, viewing them as a direct challenge to their authority. Locke's advocacy for natural rights, government by consent, and the right to revolt against unjust rulers threatened the foundations of absolute rule. They argued that such democratic principles could lead to chaos and undermine social order, insisting that a strong, centralized authority was necessary for stability and security. Consequently, they dismissed Locke's theories as radical and dangerous.
about nothing, he was a good man, believed that men were able to govern themselves, and believed in an absolute democracy.
That people should give up there natural rights (social contract)