The rule of the Law was important as without a system to retrain absolute freedom in society there would be chaos and anarchy would prevail.
Well, this is a VERY broad question and the answer could fill books. So to try to keep it short and sweet, if we didn't have a relatively uniform set of laws to govern our interactions with one another:
1. we might have to rely on a person (king) or group of people (committee) to make decisions that could vary from person to person and situation to situation arbitrarily because one day the king likes you and the next day he wants to take your head off....
2. everyone or multiple groups of people would have to establish their own rules of conduct and because those sets of rules could conflict with each other, you could have chaos or anarchy. That also can happen because people no restraints against their personal conduct and are not accountable to anyone for anything.
Hence, "rule of law" provides some possibility for a relatively cohesive set of rules of conduct for a society to rely upon so that human interaction, trade and commerce can function, if not actually flourish.
Of course there are some forms of government where rule of law is so strict or oppressive that there is no "freedom", but the idea is that if everyone is subject to the same miserable rules, at least they are consistent and uniform and you can't suggest differential treatment (discrimination). Alternatively rule of law can be so lax that some groups wind up reaping most of the benefits and others reap few or none because there is no impetus for social justice or economic reform.
If we didn't have laws the whole country would be full of violence
Laws are important in many ways! One major reason on why it is important is because without laws no one would be in control and lots of bad stuff will occur in the world such as murdering, raping, and kidnapping! So in that case laws are really important!
Added: SHORT ANSWER: Without the rule of law, ANARCHY would ensue and civilization, as we know it, would collapse.
equality and justice
equality and justice
Exactly
Australia's legal system is founded on the rule of law. The judicial is interdependent and seeks to award justice to all.
what are the five fundamental principlesthe 5 fundamental principles of a democracy are:Personal LibertyRespect for the IndividualEquality of OpportunityPopular ConsentDemocratic Values in Conflict
It is legal integrity.
American bystander rule: there is no legal duty to rescue or call for help to aid someone who's in danger even if helping poses no risk whatsoever to the potential rescuer.
The "M'Naghten Rule" is one of the oldest tests of insanity in the US legal system, dating back to 1843. It states that a defendant is legally insane if, at the time of the crime, they did not know the nature of their actions or did not know what they were doing was wrong.
You cannot, it is a fundamental rule of math.
The American did rule the Philippines for 300 years. During the colonization period the Americans used their system of governance that was later adopted by the Filipinos.
If you are talking about the Mailbox Rule, then yes. Acceptance of an offer is binding upon the moment it is properly mailed, while an Offer, a Revocation, or a Rejection are binding upon receipt. An acceptance does not have to actually be received by the offeror for it to be effective, as long as it was properly mailed. This rule only applies when using the mail, as in the post office.
Pertaining to the foundation or basis; serving for the foundation. Hence: Essential, as an element, principle, or law; important; original; elementary; as, a fundamental truth; a fundamental axiom., A leading or primary principle, rule, law, or article, which serves as the groundwork of a system; essential part, as, the fundamentals of the Christian faith.