If they aren't, they'd be able to print or broadcast anything and not care what their actions would lead to. Lots of nasty things could come from that. Innocent people could have their reputations destroyed, lose their jobs ASO.
No
The independence of media means that in reporting events the media should not be influenced or controlled by any external body. Neither the government nor the business house who own the media should influence its reporting. In most democracies several laws have been enacted to ensure the independence of media.
yes i think he should be accountable for his actions
They should and are.
If they aren't, they'd be able to print or broadcast anything and not care what their actions would lead to. Lots of nasty things could come from that. Innocent people could have their reputations destroyed, lose their jobs ASO.
media should not be done away with
yes, I believe that business should be held accountable for there action while conduct business.
Members of Parliament (MPs) are primarily accountable to their constituents, the voters in their electoral district, as they are elected to represent their interests and concerns. Additionally, they are accountable to their political parties, which have expectations regarding loyalty and adherence to party policies. MPs are also subject to the laws and regulations governing parliamentary conduct, ensuring transparency and ethical behavior. Lastly, they can be held accountable through mechanisms like public inquiries and media scrutiny.
The fourth estate
why state should not bind media
The security officer or Administrator
The Federal Government.