no it would not........ i think
no it would not........ i think
It is possible to have a government without a state by having a system where governing institutions operate independently from a central authority or overarching state structure. This can occur in situations like anarchy, where governance is decentralized and power is dispersed among various organizations or groups within a society, leading to a form of self-governing without a formal state apparatus.
freedom of assembly
freedom of assembly
A system of government by groups or officals?
It will likely be the groups that already rely heavily upon their government. People who are on welfare or other government assistance. While they may not support the potential control of their everyday lives, it may be easier for them to accept total government control of the economy. There are some groups who already wish for a totalitarian form of government, so they will be happy with it. Those who are disheartened and see no hope without government intervention will also likely by supportive of total government control.
citizens can affect policies without running for office
special intrest groups are groups in the government
special intrest groups are groups in the government
Without knowing the original host organization, it's impossible to know what 2 groups emerged from the split. However in government, liberals and conservatives are often considered groups that split from a host organization.
An "oligarchy" is a system of government by groups or officials. It is a government that is run be several people as a group. It is distinguished from a "monarch", which is a government run by one person.A system of government run by groups or officials is bureaucratic.A bureaucracy is a system of government by groups of officials. An autocracy is a system of government where one person rules with total power.
A system of government by a group of officials would be an oligarchy.