Whether specimens need to be thick depends on the context and purpose of the study. In some cases, thicker specimens may provide better structural integrity or more detailed analysis, particularly in microscopy or histology. However, for other applications, thinner specimens may be preferred for better visibility or to facilitate certain types of measurements. Ultimately, the thickness required is determined by the specific requirements of the experiment or analysis being conducted.
Better than what? - It isn't clear what you are comparing with what.
It depends on what you're comparing this to.
Comparing digital cameras all depends on what you are looking for in a camera. Try comparing the megapixels on the camera. The higher the megapixel, the better the picture it will produce.
Comparing to human a Tiger can see six time better in day and five time better in night.
It depends on what is required of the dog and of the owner.
no , not at all, no point in comparing
You are comparing different years of the same model. Which is better, and apricot or a guava?
That is an opinion that varies depending on who you ask and in what context you are comparing the two.
Morphometric measurements in fishes provide quantitative data on the physical proportions and shape of different body parts, which can be used to characterize species, study growth patterns, and identify evolutionary relationships. Meristic measurements involve counting the number of specific features, such as fin rays or scales, which can also aid in species identification and population studies. Together, these measurements help scientists better understand the biology, ecology, and evolution of fish species.
Stains are used to enhance contrast and visibility of thin compound microscope specimens by binding to specific structures and highlighting them. This allows for better visualization and analysis of the specimen's internal components.
Women are better than men.