Fossils are very less and should be protected , it teaks millions of years for the formation of fossils , if all the available fossils are finished, then we will not able to enjoy the benefits of them and also to make our future generation to enjoy the benefits of fossils we should protect them . It would be better if we use a possible alternative in place of Fossils
Yes, Alberta's fossils should be protected due to their significant scientific, educational, and cultural value. These fossils provide crucial insights into Earth's history, evolution, and past ecosystems, making them invaluable for research and education. Protecting them also preserves Alberta's natural heritage and promotes tourism, which can benefit local economies. Additionally, safeguarding fossils from vandalism and environmental degradation ensures that future generations can study and appreciate these important resources.
should be protected.
All constitutional freedoms should be protected.
Yes they should be
the question should be what aren't interesting about fossils because without fossils we wouldn't have discovered new species of fish, birds, bugs and we wouldn't know about dinosaurs!!
no
Leather back turtles should be protected because they are rare and we need to keep them safe
a flood plain should be protected or else people would build on one and won't survive
sedimentary rock my guy fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils fossils nbut u cant see thrm lel
Imprint fossils, Mineralized fossils, frozen fossils, fossils in amber, and cast fossils.
in the ground near an under populated area
The kiwi is a flightless bird that is generally native to New Zealand. Kiwis should be protected as they are very few in numbers and have too many predators. If not protected, the kiwi may sooner or later be extinct.