In and of themselves, neither. They are just tools, tools have no ethics or morals; their users do though.
The psychological effects of nuclear weapons would require a formal style of writing due to its serious and complex nature. It would involve in-depth research, analysis, and an objective presentation of findings. On the other hand, personal weight loss or preferences in living environments may not necessarily warrant a formal style, as they could be presented in a more casual or narrative tone depending on the context and audience.
Well I think they are bad but do good things . but other people say differently they say that humans are good but they sometimes do bad things so it really depends on what your opinion is . i hope this helped with your homework . ( if it was homework )
A good influence positively impacts your thoughts, behaviors, and decisions, while a bad influence has a negative effect on these aspects. Good influences may inspire growth, motivation, and well-being, whereas bad influences may encourage harmful or destructive actions. Ultimately, good influences help you become a better version of yourself, while bad influences hinder your personal development.
When Bad Things Happen to Good People was created in 1978.
Author Mary C. Neal is commonly credited with saying, "There are no bad people, just good people who make bad decisions." This sentiment is often used to convey the idea that people are not inherently good or bad, but rather their actions determine their moral character.
Nuclear weapons are tools. Tools can be neither bad nor good. The only things that can be bad or good are the people using them and the purpose those people use them for.
Yes.
imminent chaos! Nuclear weapons are a bad idea. Refer to the Cuban missle crisis.
Nuclear reactions can be both good and bad. They can produce clean energy, like in nuclear power plants, but also be used to create nuclear weapons which have destructive capabilities. The key is in how nuclear reactions are managed and controlled.
nuclear is good and bad at the same time.
Plutonium is very important for nuclear weapons and for nuclear fuels used in nuclear reactors. But plutonium is also toxic and radioactive. See the link below.
Nuclear weapons are a good thing for the United States because they prevent others from using nuclear weapons on the US. In general, the world would probably be a better place without nuclear weapons if it weren't for the fact that they lead to research in all fields of Nuclear Engineering, like Nuclear Power plants and Nuclear Physics. Since nuclear weapons already exist in the world, for the US to get rid of their nuclear weapons would be unwise. Countries that dislike nuclear weapons or even radical terrorist cells and organizations would now have no reason not to launch a nuclear warhead at the US since no retaliation would occur. The strategy of nuclear weapons preventing others from using them against the US is called the Deterrent Strategy.
The bad conclusion nuclear weapons brings.
No one should have nuclear weapons! I agree they cause nothing but problems. All they do is grant people power to kill and strike fear in the world. There is nothing good that can come from nuclear weapons.
Those that are nuclear, such as the nuclear bombs.
Zambia does not have nuclear weapons.
In nuclear weapons depots.