Reflexes are primarily a result of nature, as they are automatic and unconscious responses to stimuli that are hardwired in the nervous system. While reflexes can be influenced by experience and learning to some extent (nurture), their basic patterns are innate and present from birth.
Yes, certain characteristics such as intelligence, personality traits, and behavior can be influenced by both genetic factors (nature) and environmental factors (nurture). These characteristics result from complex interactions between our genes and our environment, making it difficult to pinpoint a single cause.
Nature and nurture have both played a role in shaping who I am today. Nature influences my genetics and predispositions, while nurture impacts my environment and experiences. Together, they have contributed to my personality, skills, beliefs, and behaviors.
Kohlberg's theory of moral development is a combination of both nature and nurture. He believed that individuals are born with a capacity for moral reasoning (nature), but that this capacity is influenced and developed through social interactions and experiences (nurture).
Reflexes that result from practice or repetition are known as conditioned reflexes. These are learned responses to a specific stimulus that have been acquired through experience or training.
Answer = Tabula rasa- Apex
Nature v/s Nurture....This is a long discussion about what defines a human being: How much of what you are is determined by your genes (nature), and how much is determined by the environment in which you grow (nurture)?In other words "innate qualities" v/s "personal experience".Nowadays almost everyone agrees that it has to be a mixture of both. But where one ends and the other starts is still discussion material.Example question: Is criminal behaviour a result of nature or nurture?
Nature and nurture go hand in hand * I think *
Piaget's theory emphasizes the role of cognitive development in children, suggesting that nature (genetic factors) and nurture (environmental influences) interact to shape individuals' intellectual growth. He believed that children actively construct their understanding of the world through experiences, and that both biological and environmental factors play a crucial role in this process. Nature provides the foundation for cognitive development, while nurture refines and shapes this development through interaction with the environment.
False. Nature refers to genetics, nurture refers to environmental conditions.
Family is considered important in the nature vs. nurture debate because of the close relationship children have with parents and siblings. While it is not certain, much negative behavior is believed to be a result of how a person was raised.
nurture(phcological) natrue(environment)
nature if that is what you mean.
Nature refers to the influence of genetics and biology on an individual's development and traits, while nurture refers to the impact of one's environment, experiences, and upbringing. Nature is the innate qualities that a person is born with, while nurture is the external factors that shape an individual throughout their life. Both nature and nurture interact to shape an individual's behavior, personality, and characteristics.
Nature and nurture.
The web address of the Nurture Nature Center is: www.nurturenaturecenter.org
Nature and nurture have both played a role in shaping who I am today. Nature influences my genetics and predispositions, while nurture impacts my environment and experiences. Together, they have contributed to my personality, skills, beliefs, and behaviors.
Reflexes that result from practice or repetition are known as conditioned reflexes. These are learned responses to a specific stimulus that have been acquired through experience or training.