In my opinion it is important to have had some experience when looking at something and recognizing it. But sometimes you can look at something for the first time and take it for known because you have had previous experiences with objects that are alike, similar to the one you are seeing at the moment and recognizing.
There are several examples. Let me see if I can make one clear for you: when you see the pen you write with every day you know it is your pen, you recognize it as being yours because you have been with it before (you bought it, you looked at it, you wrote with it) . You recognize this object, and you make it part of your visual perception, you see it and you know what it is because you have done that before. Now imagine you see a new pen, you have never seen that pen before, it's the first time it's in your visual perception, you immediately recognize this object because it has similar features to your pen. It has the same structure, it writes, you hold it the same way, but it's not the same as your pen, so you identify the two objects (your pen and this new one) as different objects in your visual perception: allowing you to recognize them and tell which one is which the next time you see them (because you have already experienced it this time).
That question is addressed philosophically, and there are two theories: one that says experience does play an important role in object recognition and visual perception and another one that says it is not important. For me, to recognize an object and to make it part of your visual perception, you have to have experience. Nevertheless, experience is not the one who determines object recognition and visual perception 100%.
The DV in this experiment is the size of objects reported by participants and the distances given to the objects. The DV is always what they are measuring. Think of the results table....what do the numbers in it mean? What do they represent? This will help you remember how to ge the DV
a psychological report is a report about the psych of a person. after studying the psych of a person, now you do this report to discuss the report to the answerer :) am i understood? hit vote to rate this a s the best answer
In the conclusion paragraph of a report, you should summarize the key findings or points discussed in the report. It should restate the main purpose of the report and provide any recommendations or suggestions for further action. Additionally, it is important to emphasize the importance of the findings and their implications for future work.
To report the F statistic in a statistical analysis, you need to provide the value of the F statistic along with the degrees of freedom for the numerator and denominator. This information is typically included in the results section of a research paper or report.
Before starting to write a research report, the writer must thoroughly review and analyze the research findings, organize the data, create an outline, and ensure they understand the audience and purpose of the report.
for any seminar report contact amrutha4seminars@gmail.com
Seminar report on grating light valve technology?
Can you give the seminar report on wireless usb and related ppt?
no
The seminar report on a smart quill should contain all the information discussed on the smart quill. The organizers of the seminar are the people who set the topic to be discussed.
yes
No, but you could do your research and complete a seminar on the subject.
yes
yes
electronics engineering
i wan't to get the full report about pillcamera
digital scent technology