It is not accurate to make a blanket statement that humans have more control over their destinies based on being a product of nature rather than nurture. Both nature and nurture influence human development and behavior, and individuals have varying degrees of control over their destinies regardless of these factors. Additionally, the interaction between nature and nurture is complex and can differ from person to person.
The view that humans acquire all or almost all their behavioral traits from "nurture" was termed by philosopher John Locke tabula rasa ("blank slate") and proposes that humans develop from only environmental influences. This question was once considered to be an appropriate division of developmental influences, but since both types of factors are known to play such interacting roles in development, most modern psychologists and anthropologists consider the question naive-representing an outdated state of knowledge
Gender is influenced by a combination of nature and nurture. While biological factors play a role in determining a person's gender, socialization and cultural norms also shape how individuals understand and express their gender identity. It is important to recognize that gender is a complex and multifaceted concept that is not solely defined by biology or environment.
The "nature vs. nurture" debate suggests that either genetics ("nature") or the environment ("nurture'') played a major role in producing particular behaviors, personality traits, psychological disorders, or pretty much any other thing that a human does. The emerging picture from current research is that both nurture and nature play a role in directing behavior, and the focus has shifted to examining the relative contributions of each influence rather than the absolute contributions of either influence alone. In short, it's the interaction of genes and environmental influences that determines what humans do.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau believed that humans are naturally good and that society corrupts them. He argued that individuals are born with an innate sense of compassion and virtue, but that society and its institutions lead to the development of negative traits. Rousseau emphasized the importance of nature over nurture in shaping a person's character and moral values.
Aggression can be influenced by both innate factors, such as genetic predispositions and brain structure, as well as learned behaviors from environmental factors like upbringing and life experiences. The interplay of nature and nurture plays a significant role in shaping an individual's aggressive tendencies.
when they care and nurture for them.
The belief/outlook is called Fatalism and the person would be called a "fatalist".
Nature versus nurture.
It would be very difficult for humans to ingest Riddex, since it works by electrical pulses, not chemicals. If you are worried about accidental poisoning by a pest control product, consult a physician.
...nurture. Otherwise known as a theory that suggests that we humans can change what is inherently in our "nature" by cultivating (nurturing) other behaviors.
Humans kill so many it is like we control the population.
Negative, humans make robots. Humans will always be in control.
No, there is no way for humans to control the weather.
Because sometimes when humans control floods they can cause damage to nearby areas.
By sexual reproduction.
poo and pee
Humanism emphasized the importance of individualism, reason, and the potential for humans to improve themselves and society through education and study of classical texts. It also promoted the idea that humans have the ability to shape their own destinies and should strive for personal fulfillment and achievement.