answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

A. The Controlled Experiment

The experimenter directly manipulates the presence or strength of a factor or variable and measures how behavior is affected by it. That is, the experimenter controls all factors and manipulates one (referred to as the Independent variable) and observes/measures the effects of this variable on some measure of behavior (the resulting behavioral measurement is referred to as the Dependent variable)

An Example:

Hypothesis: Stress has a detrimental effect on performance.

Independent Variable (designed to manipulate the level of stress)

(e.g. subjects given different feedback on their performance in an academic test

Levels:

1.) Subjects informed they performed poorly (experimental group)

2.) Subjects told nothing (control group)

Dependent Variable (the measurement of for example reaction time and error rate on a separate task - performed after the feedback/no feedback)

The performance of the experimental group (high stress condition) is then compared to that of the control group (no stress condition). If the performance of the experimental group is statistically poorer (slower reaction times and more errors) compared to the control group, then the experimental hypothesis is said to be supported.

Pros: the experimenter directly controls the variables to be studied and this type of experiment is typically performed in a laboratory where conditions can be controlled.

Cons: experimenter bias can play a part in the results in that the subjects can 'pick up on' what the experimenter wants to happen and perform according to expectations. Also, it can be difficult to generalize results obtained in the lab to behavior in the real world.

B. The Observational Method

This involves simply observing and describing behavior in specific settings. These observations can lead to 'tighter' hypotheses, which can be tested more rigorously using the experimental method (see above)

Pros: can give the investigator greater insight into a behavior and lead to more accurate hypotheses

Cons: it can be difficult using this method to separate cause and effect.

C. The Correlational Method

This method is used when psychologists want to study relationships between variables, which they cannot control or experimentally manipulate due to either practical or ethical reasons (e.g. the effect of natural disasters on future coping strategies, or if a person is abused as a child what is the likelihood that they will abuse their own children?)

This relationship is measured via a statistical test referred to as a correlation coefficient (r). If r is +1.00 there is a perfect positive relationship, if it is -1.00 there is a perfect negative relationship and if r is 0 there is no relationship between the 2 variables being measured.

Pros: can study behavior in natural environments and can help to structure future predictions.

Cons: it is difficult if not impossible to say with any real certainty if the variables are related - thus cause and effect is difficult to determine.

D. Case Studies

The study of individuals, which include detailed biographical reconstruction, information derived from observation, interview with the person, their spouse and/or other acquaintances that know the person to be studied etc. Most often used by clinical and personality psychologists. Can also be used with specific groups (e.g. patients with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder).

Pros: can lead to complete theory changes or can direct further, more controlled experimental studies.

Cons: typically there is a lack of a control population, the observations are based on individuals and therefore tend to be difficult to generalize to the wider population.

E. Surveys and Tests

These can be used to study important topics (e.g. attitudes to racism) that are difficult to study via direct observation.

Pros: can test a large number of people via questionnaires and interviews. Is cost-effective.

Cons: predictions are only as good as the questions on the survey/test, people can be biased to respond in order to make themselves appear more 'favorable' - therefore can be open to lying and/or misinterpretation of the questions by the respondents.

F. Discourse Analysis

A detailed analysis of conversations. Typically used by social psychologists who infer attitudes/opinions of the subjects through the analysis of what they say about the topic of interest.

Pros: not structured like questionnaires, allows a person to respond to questions in their own way.

Cons: open to different interpretations by different investigators.

Conclusions

The experimental method is the most popular and the strongest method used by psychologists in their attempts to study behavior. The other methods can be useful however in that they can direct testing of specific hypotheses and ultimately test existing theories.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Psychology applies different methods which include;

1. Public observation

2. Interview ( non-experimental)

3. Survey ( non-experimental)

4. Natural setting observation

5. Relational research

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Methods use by psychologies in studying behavior?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What are the methods in study of psychology?

in my point of view, I consider the method of studying behavior is psychology is a great st use they study all the kind of behavior. for example until the less detail.


Different methods use in studying sociology?

check


Why is it important to use the sociological imagination when studying society and human behavior?

" Sociological imagination? " I would think it more important to use the scientific method in your studies of human behavior.


What is a sentence for the word behavior?

Agatha, your behaviour is unacceptable.We are studying the behaviour of monkeys.


What is one thing that organizational behavior has not developed from its scientific heritage?

Use of scientific methods


What are five examples of instruments or methods that scientists use for studying currents?

There are a couple of instruments or methods they use. They are : drogues, Argo float, flow meters, Doppler Acoustic Current Meters, satellites, radioactive chemicals, and rubber ducks.


What methods did geologists use when they first developed the time scale?

The methods the geologists used when they first developed the geologic time scale. Were studying rock layers and index fossils worldwide. By Patrick


How historians study the past?

Historians study the past by studying the previous recorded events of the past activities. They use both the scientific and traditional methods to gather such information which they then use to compile their documentary evidence.


What are the methods of measuring personality by organizational behavior experts?

Organizational behavior experts use various methods to measure personality, such as self-assessments, observer assessments, interviews, and standardized assessments like the Big Five personality traits model. These methods help in understanding individual differences in characteristics like extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness to experience, which can impact behavior and performance in organizational settings.


What is the difference between numerical methods and analytical methods?

Numerical methods involve approximating solutions to mathematical problems using iterative algorithms and computer simulations, whereas analytical methods focus on finding exact solutions using formulas, equations, and mathematical techniques. Numerical methods are often used when analytical solutions are not feasible or too complex to obtain.


What are the electro physiological methods for studying excitable tissues?

Physiologists use of microelectrodes to measure changes in the electrical properties of the cell membrane and to inject current to activate voltage sensitive channels in the neurons.


Why can't sociologists empirically study religion?

Sociologists can study religion empirically through various methods such as surveys, interviews, and observations. They may face challenges due to the complexity of religious beliefs and practices, potential bias in data collection, and the sensitive nature of the topic. However, with careful research design and methodologies, sociologists can still investigate religious phenomena in a systematic and empirical way.