answersLogoWhite

0

Naturalistic observation, can be divided into two main sections, overt and covert.

The advantages of using overt naturalistic observation is that you see your participants in their natural everyday environment, going about their daily lives as they would normally, however, this can cause demand characteristics in the participants as they may behave how they think the researcher wants them to.

The advantages of using covert naturalistic observation is that your results will be extremely high in ecological validity, and there will be very few if no anomolous behaviours, however, covert observation of any kind can bring about numerous ethical issues.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Psychology

Which goal in psychology is most closely met through naturalistic observation?

The goal of understanding behavior in its natural setting is most closely met through naturalistic observation in psychology. This method allows researchers to observe and document behaviors as they naturally occur, without interference from artificial laboratory settings. Naturalistic observation helps researchers gain insights into how individuals behave in real-life situations.


How did a naturalistic worldview affect modern psychology?

A naturalistic worldview led to the development of empirically-based methods in psychology, such as observation and experimentation. This shift in thinking influenced a focus on understanding behavior and mental processes in terms of biological, environmental, and social factors. It also contributed to the emergence of fields like behavioral neuroscience and evolutionary psychology.


Which goals of psychology is most closely met through naturalistic observation?

The goal of describing behavior is most closely met through naturalistic observation in psychology. This method allows researchers to observe and record behaviors as they naturally occur in real-life settings without interference or manipulation. This helps provide a thorough and accurate understanding of human and animal behavior in their natural environments.


Who is the first psychologist to argue that psychology should be a naturalistic science of the study of behavior?

Wilhelm Wundt is often credited as the first psychologist to argue that psychology should be a naturalistic science focusing on the study of behavior. He founded the first psychology laboratory in 1879 and is considered the father of experimental psychology.


What is The cardinal rule of naturalistic observation?

The cardinal rule of naturalistic observation is to refrain from interfering with the subjects being observed. Observers should aim to be as unobtrusive as possible and avoid influencing the behavior of the subjects in any way.

Related Questions

Which goal in psychology is most closely met through naturalistic observation?

The goal of understanding behavior in its natural setting is most closely met through naturalistic observation in psychology. This method allows researchers to observe and document behaviors as they naturally occur, without interference from artificial laboratory settings. Naturalistic observation helps researchers gain insights into how individuals behave in real-life situations.


What are the disadvantage of naturalistic observation psyhcology?

Some potential disadvantages of naturalistic observation in psychology include the lack of experimental control over variables, potential observer bias or subject reactivity, and limited generalizability of findings to other settings or populations. Additionally, naturalistic observations may be time-consuming and labor-intensive.


Under what situations is naturalistic observation the best mode of study What are its advantages and disadvantages?

disadvantage - less control over variables


What is a naturalistic experiment?

in psychology terms what is a naturalistic experiment and a longitudinal study?


What are the differences between laboratory observation and naturalistic observation?

Laboratory observation takes place in a controlled environment where researchers manipulate variables, while naturalistic observation occurs in the subject's natural environment without interference. Laboratory observation allows for more precise control over variables and conditions, whereas naturalistic observation provides insights into real-world behaviors and interactions.


How did a naturalistic worldview affect modern psychology?

A naturalistic worldview led to the development of empirically-based methods in psychology, such as observation and experimentation. This shift in thinking influenced a focus on understanding behavior and mental processes in terms of biological, environmental, and social factors. It also contributed to the emergence of fields like behavioral neuroscience and evolutionary psychology.


Is an example of people?

naturalistic observation. =)


Which goals of psychology is most closely met through naturalistic observation?

The goal of describing behavior is most closely met through naturalistic observation in psychology. This method allows researchers to observe and record behaviors as they naturally occur in real-life settings without interference or manipulation. This helps provide a thorough and accurate understanding of human and animal behavior in their natural environments.


People watching is an example of?

naturalistic observation. =)


What is observation techniques?

Observation techniques involve the systematic process of collecting data by watching and recording behaviors, events, or activities. This can include direct observation, participant observation, structured observation, and naturalistic observation. These techniques are commonly used in fields such as psychology, sociology, education, and anthropology to gather accurate and detailed information about various phenomena.


The careful observation and recording of behavior in real-life settings is called?

Naturalistic observation.


Is naturalistic observation the most vulnerable to the effects of wording?

No. In naturalistic observation, you are observing the participants in their "natural habitat", so wording has very little - if anything at all - to do with how the participants behave.