Observation, in a scientific sense, has the key attributes of objectivity and repeatability. Pseudoscience are non-scientific subjects which are discussed in a scientific way. Although several criteria have been identified as characteristic of pseudoscience, the key things are claiming that a subject is "scientific" without conforming to the scientific method.
Observation is the act of noticing and recording something that has been directly perceived. Inference involves making logical conclusions based on observations and prior knowledge. Prediction is a statement about what will happen in the future based on observations, inferences, and patterns.
a qualitive observation is observing something without using numbers like here is an example: the cell is round with blue cytoplasm in it. a quanitive observation is with using numbers only. here is an example: the tree is 23 inches round and 17ft off the ground. that is the difference.
Observation involves passive monitoring or watching of a situation without active participation. Engagement, on the other hand, involves actively participating, interacting, or getting involved in a situation. Observation is more about taking in information, while engagement involves taking action or contributing in some way.
Naturalistic observation is when the person doesn't know that they are being observed. It takes place in a natural environment. Example: You're watching every move of a cricketer and observing what he is doing while he has no idea that YOU are observing him Controlled observation is like when the person conducting the research that is the psychologist conducting this in the lab. He knows you're watching
Pseudoscience is a claim that is presented as scientific, but lacks any supporting evidence, cannot be tested and does not adhere to a valid scientific method. A type of pseudoscience is "pop science."
You
The main difference between science and pseudoscience is that science is based on evidence, experimentation, and peer review, while pseudoscience lacks these rigorous methods and often relies on unproven claims or beliefs.
science is real and pseudoscience is fake
Pseudoscience is not independently verifiable. Independant researchers, following the same procedures, would not reliably get the same results.
Pseudoscience is not independently verifiable. Independant researchers, following the same procedures, would not reliably get the same results.
Being
difference between an observaton and explanation
The main difference between science and pseudoscience is that science relies on evidence, experimentation, and peer review to support its claims, while pseudoscience often lacks empirical evidence and does not follow the scientific method.
science is real and pseudoscience is fake
Science is based on systematic observation, experimentation, and the scientific method, aiming to understand and explain natural phenomena through testable and falsifiable hypotheses. Pseudoscience, on the other hand, lacks empirical support and methodological rigor; it often relies on anecdotal evidence, appeals to belief, or confirmation bias. While science evolves with new evidence, pseudoscience tends to remain static, often disregarding contradictory evidence. This fundamental difference in approach and validation distinguishes credible scientific inquiry from pseudoscientific claims.
An alternate answer.
The difference between science and (sudo) pseudoscience is that science is based on factual information gathered without a person biased opinion. but on the other hand pseudoscience is twisting facts to suite a often crazy postulate (often based on racism or something conspiratorial to show others that this misinformation is in-fact information.