thinking like a scientist (QURON) answered this
the cumulative knowledge and experience of the best people.
The method that involves gaining knowledge through observation of events, data collection, and logical reasoning is known as the scientific method in psychology. Researchers use this systematic approach to formulate and test hypotheses, gather empirical evidence, and draw conclusions based on data and logic.
The development of evolutionary theory involved both inductive and deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning was used to gather data from observations of natural phenomena, while deductive reasoning was used to derive general principles and hypotheses from this data. This combination of reasoning allowed scientists like Charles Darwin to formulate the theory of evolution.
The opposite of empirical evidence is anecdotal evidence, which is based on personal accounts or hearsay rather than systematic observation or experimentation.
Hypothetical reasoning is the process of drawing conclusions based on a series of hypothetical statements or assumptions. It involves creating a logical chain of reasoning to explore the potential outcomes or implications of different scenarios. This type of reasoning is commonly used in philosophy, science, and problem-solving.
empirical
empirical
Empirical reasoning.
Both comparative ideological and empirical reasoning have their own value depending on the context. Comparative ideological reasoning can provide insights into philosophical and normative questions, while empirical reasoning offers concrete evidence and data to analyze real-world outcomes. The choice between the two may depend on the specific question being addressed and the available evidence.
Empirical evidence and the application of reasoning to it.
Descartes reasoning was based on deriving principles that were then the premise of deductive reasoning. Bacon, on the other hand, used empirical observations that were then used for inductive reasoning.
Inductive reasoning is empirical in nature, meaning it is based on observations and past experiences. It involves drawing general conclusions from specific examples or instances. However, the conclusions reached through inductive reasoning are not guaranteed to be true, as they rely on the evidence available at the time.
Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations or data. It is empirical in nature because it relies on evidence collected through observation or experiment to draw conclusions about broader patterns or trends.
Inductive
Empirical methods rely on observation and experimentation to gather data, while rational methods use logic and reasoning to analyze information.
Inductive reasoning is empirical in nature, meaning it is grounded in observation and experience. It involves drawing general conclusions from specific instances or patterns observed in the real world. This form of reasoning relies on evidence and data collection, allowing for hypotheses to be formed based on accumulated knowledge. Ultimately, inductive reasoning helps to generate theories that can be tested and refined through further observation.
inductive reasoning is self propagation and self establishedinductive reasoning starts with empirical observations of specific phenomena, then establishes a general rule to fit the observed facts.deductive reasoning starts with a general rule, then applies that rule to a specific instance.