Want this question answered?
blood chemistry
Well, scientifically speaking, that would have to be an Unconciousologist.Source:Who_studies_how_unconscious_motives_and_conflicts_determine_human_behavior
Freud acknowledges the unconscious level of mental awareness. These trapped or repressed memories during childhood contribute to mental disorders. Ignoring them may hinder recovery, as they will continue to haunt the individual.
Psychoanalysis
behavioral
blood chemistry
blood chemistry
Behavior among men and women would be more universal around the world.
the influence of unconscious forces on human behavior
Well, scientifically speaking, that would have to be an Unconciousologist.Source:Who_studies_how_unconscious_motives_and_conflicts_determine_human_behavior
Behaviorist
That would be Sigmund Freud the psychoanalyst who studied human behavior based on the human unconscious. He theorized that all behavior was a consequence of our sexual desires and deviant thoughts that we suppress to the subconscious.
Mindless Behavior would most likely date girls from ages 14 &nd up
Organisms that have behaviors that encourage reproduction would be more likely to reproduce.
A contusion (bruise) would likely result from a sudden blow to the body.
Behavior that is operating underneath the realm of waking consciousness. Perhaps the unconscious behavior springs forth from an unconscious need. Did anyone see "Fatal Attraction" a long time ago? The scariest scene in the movie for me would be a good example of unconscious behavior springing forth out of an unconscious need.. Glenn Close, creates an absolutely chilling character, esp. in the scene where she is standing in Michael Douglas' kitchen, seemingly completely unaware that she is holding onto a knife and cutting into her own flesh and bleeding (this is the unconscious behavior.) But on a conscious level, she seems to be aware that she is standing in the presence of a man with whom she is infatuated, and feeling unseen by him. So, if my memory serves me accurately, she stands there, smiling, acting a bit coy, letting him in on a big secret (that's she's crazy about him), then when he fails to acquiesce, she begins pressing him with a stern disapproving look, all the while wanting to set things back on the right track with 'her man.' The incongruity b/w her conscious and unconscious behavior is quite fascinating and scary. Michael Douglas' character is likely realizing that this woman is not only completely out of her mind but an immediate danger to his well being. This is the impact of her unconscious behavior leaking out. She seems to be thinking "How can I get my man back? Why can't he just see me as he saw me that night we met, it would be soooo nice, wouldn't it? :-) But what seems to be truly operating inside and driving her in this moment is a buried history of incomprehensible pain and hurt, so her unconscious need is for RELIEF from pain and inner torment. Of course, she doesn't view herself as crazy or dangerous. She must find a man (in her delusion) that will love her, this time without all the pain. Meanwhile, the character's absolutey c r a z y unconscious behavior is totally leaking out of her, and signalling to him "I am hopelessly damaged. I could kill you right now." This sets up a later scene where the audience infers that she's killed the family pet, a bunny rabbit. The audience doesn't acually see her putting the rabbit into the pot of boiling water, but you just know she was completely out of her mind when she did it. How can human behavior get much scarier than that???
conflict theorists