Because the legislators from tobacco states have a great deal of political clout. Most of them, subsidized in their elections by the tobacco companies, have been in office for a long time, and have become prominent on many committees and in other positions that control such issues.
No tobacco is safe even if it's pure. However, if you are wanting to smoke, I would suggest organic tobacco
Cigar, cigaret, chew on tobacco if you play sports never chew tobacco you are GOING to get KICKED OFF THE TEAM
47%
We can't imagine why anyone would go to the trouble of counterfeiting tobacco, but you should be able to tell when you smoke it. No buzz, no nicotine.
Tobacco
Subsidies to farmers are a means to insure they can still make a profit when they sell their crops seasonally. Food is cheap, and as such, a farmer may or may not be able to make a living farming. so, no.
Agricultural Adjustment Act This New Deal program helped farmers through price support subsidies.
Agricultural Adjustment Act was The New Deal Program helped farmers through price support subsidies.
Tobacco farmers.
They do not produce any edible products since tobacco farmers by definition grow tobacco.
Democrats. The reason being is that the democratic party supports farm subsidies worth millions of dollars. The farmers (naturally) vote for the Democrats because they want to keep the subsidies. The farmers stay rich because of these subsidies that they get each year. Farming subsidies started in the 1930's Great Depression era by FDR. They were supposed to keep the farmers from starving to death in a time when there was little commercially available food. Nowadays, farmers just milk the system. Source: lived in a rural community in Kentucky for 5 years and all of the farmers voted Democrat.
Pros: - Subsidies would allow for farmers to compete with low-priced foreign imports - Subsidies would keep the cost of goods down - Subsidies would help farmers maintain a steady income, helping to protect them from variations in year-to-year income. (Such as a bad growing year. Some years, there are fewer crops that are produced, be it due to poor weather or other factors, and these loss of crops would dramatically harm a farmer's income. Subsidies would help make up this difference. Cons: -It costs a fortune (remember, we are in $14 trillion in debt) -Subsidies tend to go to larger farmers, who would not be threatened as much by a bad growing year. -subsidies would go against the free market
tobacco growers in the United States
invention subsidies
The Maryland policy that required tobacco farmers to plant corn as well as tobacco was for the good of all. Tobacco had become such a cash crop, people neglected to plant corn and the food was becoming scarce.
Farmers use more pesticides on lands they do cultivate to make up for lost production.
Tobacco