Some researchers prefer quantitative research because it allows for statistical analysis and generalizability of results, while others prefer qualitative research because it provides rich, detailed insights and allows for a deeper understanding of complex phenomena. The choice between the two often depends on the research question being addressed and the preferred methodology of the researcher.
Qualitative historical researchers ensure validity by triangulating multiple sources of evidence, using methods such as member checking, peer debriefing, and establishing credibility through detailed descriptions. Reliability is established by providing transparent and systematic documentation of research methods, data collection, and analysis processes to allow for replication and verification by others in the field.
Dr. Mills's research best represents social psychology, as it focuses on understanding how individuals are influenced by the social context and the behaviors of others. Social psychology explores how people's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are shaped by the presence of others.
to comply with legal requirements. sorry but however wrote this is wrong. There are no legal requirements to report your results. It is so if others can replicate you research, it gives much more support to you findings. This allows others to predict behavior based on your findings as well as use the results of the findings to modify or control behavior, the last two goals in psychology.
Intelligence is certainly quantitative, it can be measured, even if the means to measure a certain type of intelligence has not been developed yet. If a thing can be measured, it can be qualified, or described. Simply stated, there are several different types of intelligence. Some people are academic, meaning they have a good retention and recall of information. This has typically been the venue of IQ tests. More recently, cognitive scientists have identified Emotional intelligence, what you may have heard referred to as EQ. Still others are mechanically intelligent, they excel in areas of mechanical devices regardless of the training they have received. Some are musically intelligent; these people are usually highly gifted mathematically as well. Still others are socially intelligence; these are those who seem to never make a mistake or faux pas in social environments or in interacting with others.
Qualitative skills reflected in leading people include effective communication, empathy, and the ability to inspire and motivate others. Fostering collaborative relationships involves skills like teamwork, conflict resolution, and building trust among team members to achieve common goals.
All graphs show attributes. Some attributes may be qualitative, others quantitative.
seek to understand the world through the perspectives of others.
Some variables in the data set might be qualitative, others might not. For example, if one were to sample newly arrived immigrants to Toronto, Canada and create a data set of information about them one could include both qualitative and quantitative data. One might measure each person's height which would be quantitative, and observe each person's eye colour, which would be qualitative.
There are multiple aspects to the academic method behind scholarly research. These include academic honesty, crediting the work and sources of others through citation convention, qualitative and or quantitative methodologies, and peer review and verification by experts in the field.
Qualitative historical researchers ensure validity by triangulating multiple sources of evidence, using methods such as member checking, peer debriefing, and establishing credibility through detailed descriptions. Reliability is established by providing transparent and systematic documentation of research methods, data collection, and analysis processes to allow for replication and verification by others in the field.
In Quantitative technique, the researcher's aim is to classify data in graphs, tables, or texts (Others use statistics in doing this) The variables needed in the study are carefully designed. In gathering data, a researcher may use questionnaires, interview method, or survey. This technique is effective especially in testing hypotheses.
A bibliography or a list of references can provide other researchers with a list of sources used for more information. This allows others to locate and verify the sources you have consulted in your research.
Autoethnography.
Yes, the reason being that researchers must be able to design their format of questions as well as possessing the ability to know how to inform others before they can take on the research responsibilities.
Primary research is how the human race discovers new things. Secondary research only allows you to learn about what others have already discovered (which is also important, of course, but not as important, since without primary research there would be no secondary research either).
A quantitative test in biochemistry is a test that measures the concentration or amount of a specific substance in a given sample. These tests provide numerical data that can be used to assess various aspects of biological processes, such as enzyme activity, protein concentrations, or metabolite levels, among others. Quantitative tests are important in research, clinical diagnostics, and monitoring of biological systems.
secondary research is more economical compared to primary research first and foremost the materials have already been collected by others. the researchers spends only for materials reproduction and fare for going places to gather materials.