sympathetic
25000
let me get this right, a passenger was injured in an accident, and received the drivers personal injury protection insurance im guessing for injury, and the driver want's them to pay them back? doesn't matter if you were a rabbit, and owned 5 ferrari's, if you are a PASSENGER in a car then in no way should you be liable for anything! that is why the drivers must be insured.
Probably, but the defense will argue that the passenger contributed to his injuries by not wearing the seat belt which the driver provided.
== == If no other vehicles were involved in this accident, the insurance company of the motorcycle driver has to cover the medical bills of the passenger who was injured.
NO, that's what the vehicle insurance is for.
When an accident requiring investigation occurs in a workplace, management is responsible for preserving the accident scene, after ensuring that necessary medical support is provided to anyone who was injured.
When an accident requiring investigation occurs in a workplace, management is responsible for preserving the accident scene, after ensuring that necessary medical support is provided to anyone who was injured.
The parents are responsible for his actions until he is emancipated..
The injured party should seek compensation from the driver of whichever vehicle was at fault for the accident.
The person who rented the car is responsible because they allowed the unauthorized driver to drive the car. Hertz would not be at all responsible.
Yes. If the passenger is hurt in an accident caused by the driver, the passenger is fully entitled to sue the driver. In fact even if the passenger is a spouse of the driver, the passenger can sue.
Both the driver and owner of vehicle are responsible. The injured party would sue you both.