slavery
supported their views on slavery
different views on slavery APEX
supported their views on slavery
supported their views on slavery
Albert Barnes used theological arguments based on interpretations of biblical passages to support the institution of slavery, while James Henley Thornwell also utilized biblical reasoning but focused on the idea that slavery was a necessary social institution ordained by God. Both men believed that slavery was justified from a perspective of divine approval.
slavery
Slavery
They used The Bible in maintaining that slavery was either immoral (Barnes) or acceptable (Thornwell).
Slavery.
Albert Barnes and James Henley Thornwell were both influential theologians in the 19th century, but they held differing views on key theological issues. Barnes, known for his commentaries, emphasized a more liberal interpretation of scripture and was critical of dogmatic orthodoxy. In contrast, Thornwell, a prominent Southern Presbyterian, championed a strict adherence to Reformed theology and was deeply concerned with maintaining doctrinal purity. Their differing perspectives reflect the broader theological debates of their time, particularly in relation to church authority and the interpretation of the Bible.
Albert Barnes and James Henley Thornwell had differing views on the relationship between faith and works in the context of salvation. Barnes emphasized the role of faith alone, arguing that salvation is a gift from God that cannot be earned through human efforts. In contrast, Thornwell argued for a more synergistic approach, suggesting that genuine faith must produce good works as evidence of true salvation. Their theological disagreements reflect broader debates within 19th-century American Protestantism.
They used The Bible in maintaining that slavery was either immoral (Barnes) or acceptable (Thornwell).