Because they were pacifists, meaning that they opposed war.
The Quakers were pacifists and actually had a very good relationship with the natives in their area.
Because they were pacifists, meaning that they opposed war.
Jehovahs Witnesses, Amish, and apparently quakers
I'm guessing zero based on the location of Quaker communities and the fact that they are pacifists.
The neutralists believed in neutrality during the war. They did not believe in taking sides. Many of them were pacifists that did not believe in fighting at all like the Quakers.
Pennsylvanians were Quakers. Those who settled Massachusetts were Puritans. It would take a book to detail the differences, but here are a couple of belief differences. Quakers made a break with the Church of England. They are pacifists who do not believe in war. Puritans wanted to keep the Church of England but move it more away from the Catholic Church, so their beliefs were more like protestants.
No, they are not.
AnswerQuakers were the dominant religion in Colonial North America. They were pacifists who, although they had a strong belief in there own faith, had a strong policy of religious tolerance.
Stephen H. Thiermann has written: 'Across the divide' -- subject(s): Cold War, History, Pacific settlement of international disputes, Pacifists, Political activity, Quakers, Society of Friends
Pennsylvanians were Quakers. Those who settled Massachusetts were Puritans. It would take a book to detail the differences, but here are a couple of belief differences. Quakers made a break with the Church of England. They are pacifists who do not believe in war. Puritans wanted to keep the Church of England but move it more away from the Catholic Church, so their beliefs were more like protestants.
I am not sure what a fornt is - possibly it is a mistype of font? If so the answer is no, Quakers do not observe what other Quaker churches refer to as sacraments, such as Baptism so Quakers have no need of a font.