0
What else can I help you with?
Did Thomas touch Jesus' wounds when he doubted his resurrection"?
Yes, according to the Bible, Thomas did touch Jesus' wounds when he doubted his resurrection.
What did Jesus invite doubting Thomas to do that would affirm his resurrection?
Jesus invited doubting Thomas to touch his crucified hands to prove that he was really Jesus.
Who is Thomas the Twin and what role does he play in the Bible?
Thomas the Twin, also known as Doubting Thomas, was one of the twelve disciples of Jesus. In the Bible, he is known for his skepticism and doubt regarding Jesus' resurrection. Thomas famously declared that he would not believe in Jesus' resurrection unless he could see and touch the wounds on Jesus' body. However, when Jesus appeared to him and allowed him to do so, Thomas believed and proclaimed, "My Lord and my God." Thomas' story serves as a reminder of the importance of faith and belief in the face of doubt.
How many days before anyone could touch Jesus after his resurrection?
A:This depends on the passage being read:In Matthew 28:9, the women touch Jesus, holding him by the feet, on the morning of his resurrection. Jesus allowed them to worship him thus.In John 20:17, Jesus says to Mary Magdalene, "Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended ..." In this gospel, not only could Mary not touch Jesus, but no one could before he rose to heaven.Eight days later, still in John's Gospel at verse 20:27, Jesus forgets his earlier concern and tells Thomas to touch his wounds.
In the Gospel According to John which of the apostle doubts Jesus resurrection until he sees Jesus with his own eyes?
In the Gospel According to John, it is Thomas, one of the twelve apostles, who doubts Jesus' resurrection until he sees Him with his own eyes. This account is found in John 20:24-29, where Thomas expresses his skepticism about Jesus rising from the dead. He famously declares that he will not believe unless he can see and touch the wounds of Christ. When Jesus later appears to him, Thomas responds with faith, proclaiming, "My Lord and my God!"
What evidence for the resurrection does John present?
The evidence that John presents for the resurrection of Jesus somewhat contradicts the evidence of the other gospels, but is closest to Luke, the synoptic gospel that John's Gospel most closely resembles.In John's Gospel, the risen Jesus appeared to the disciples in the upper room and showed them his wounds, but Thomas was not present. Eight days later, Jesus again appeared to the disciples, this time with Thomas present, and offered to let Thomas touch his wounds. These appearances, and the later appearance at the Sea of Galilee, are provided as evidence of the resurrection, and the wounds are the evidence that this really was Jesus, in the flesh.
How did Saint Thomas the Apostle react to the crucifixion?
I believe scripture says that Thomas, along with some of the other disciples, went back to fishing after Jesus' death. Thomas is most noted for his reaction to the resurrection of Christ. When Jesus first appeared to His disciples after His resurrection, Thomas was not there. Upon being told of the story, Thomas declared that he would not believe unless he could put his hand in the wounds in Jesus' hands and side. Jesus reappeared to His disciples and this time Thomas was there. Jesus told Thomas to go ahead and touch His hands and His side, and to believe. When Thomas saw Christ he bowed down to worship Him as Lord and God. What a great story. Even more, Jesus declared that those of us who believe without seeing are truly blessed.
Why did Jesus tell Mary Magdalene not to touch him?
According to me: Jesus, after resurrection is only an image like God. There is no visible form itself. But he can display himself to others whom he like. When he was asking Thomas to touch, again he formed to visible image, but Thomas not touched him. Like every appearance, he was making display to others. He is there, but we cannot see with naked eyes today. If he likes to show, then he can.
What disciple doubted that Jesus came back to life?
Thomas initially could not believe Jesus was present with them after crucifixion. His doubts quickly disappeared when Jesus spoke to him and invited Thomas to touch His wounds.
What disciple did not believe Jesus rose form the dead without seeing his wounds?
Thomas, also known as Doubting Thomas, did not believe that Jesus had risen from the dead until he saw and touched Jesus's wounds for himself. Jesus appeared to Thomas and invited him to touch his wounds, after which Thomas declared his belief.
Why did Jesus let Thomas touch Him but not Mary?
The widely used King James Version gives Jesus' words to Mary as follows: "Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father." Then he told her to go tell the disciples about his resurrection and coming ascension. (John 20:17) Modern speech clarifies Jesus' meaning, as we see by An American Translation's rendering: "You must not cling to me, for I have not yet gone up to my Father." It was not a question of her touching Jesus; she had not only touched him but was clinging to him, doubtless fearful that he would vanish and ascend into heaven. Jesus assured her that he was not going yet, and that she should stop clinging to him but go tell his disciples what had happened. That same day Jesus appeared to other disciples, but Thomas was not present and later said he would not believe it till he saw the nail wounds on Jesus and had thrust his hand into Jesus' speared side. A few days later Jesus did appear to the disciples when Thomas was present, and he invited Thomas to touch the wounds. (John 20:25-27) In both instances Jesus had good reasons for speaking as he did, and there is no contradiction or inconsistency between the two cases.
Where did doubting thomas come from?
The term "Doubting Thomas" originates from the New Testament of the Bible, specifically in the Gospel of John (20:24-29). It refers to Thomas, one of Jesus' twelve apostles, who doubted the resurrection of Jesus until he could see and touch Christ's wounds. This story has since become a metaphor for skepticism or disbelief in the face of evidence. The phrase is often used to describe someone who is hesitant to believe something without tangible proof.
