Three of the most commonly used philosophical arguments are:
The mere existence of so many arguments is evidence that none of them really proves anything. You would only need one argument for the existence of God if it were indisputably true.
Answer:
No, of course not.
The Bible is the foundation upon which a Christian's faith and works is built... and cannot be separated from all that follows in the Christian's changing life to any good end.
The Bible is the Divinely revealed Wisdom, Knowledge and Understanding of their God, that the world cannot perceive... in which the Christian "believes" and "trusts." The human "spirit" [the mind and heart; the human intellect] has to be personally and individually awakened by God of the Bible to the Truth awaiting a person who "believes" in what the Bible says.
The Bible is a "how-to" book that's constantly referenced and consulted as a guide for a "believer." To separate themselves from the Bible is to separate themselves from their God... only to reject Him and re-enter the unbelieving world.
A true believer shouldn't be "arguing" with anyone, trying to "prove" that his God exists... with or without the Bible. For there was a time when the believer, too, didn't believe... with or without the Bible. Before his "faith" in the Words of the Bible came... the "evidence for his God" wasn't there for the believer, either.
A believer's "faith" can only be demonstrated through his "good works"... which are visible to the doubting, unbelieving world. But these works, also, stem from what is written in the Bible:
"...I will shew thee my faith by my works." (James 2:18)
In the end... a Christian's "faith" and "trust" in the Bible [intangible spiritual elements unseen by the world] is his personal "evidence" of his God... and the "substance" of his "Hope" [Heb.11:1]... in spite of all arguments.
The Bible is inseparable from all else that follows for a "believer" in his personal growth in his God. The Bible is his source, and the start of each new day, for "his doctrine, his God's reproof, his God's correction, and his personal instruction in righteousness." [II Tim.3:16]
No... the Bible cannot be separated from the "believer's" [Christian's] evidence for his God.
whats means a supports a main idea by providing clear evidence or proof without using numbers
whats means a supports a main idea by providing clear evidence or proof without using numbers
Ask the judge
The Bible does not specifically address acting as a profession or art form. However, Christians can approach the art of performance by using their talents to glorify God, uphold moral values, and positively impact others. They should strive to be authentic, honest, and respectful in their portrayal of characters and stories.
If you are a Christian or a Jew, you may be asked to swear an oath on the Bible before giving evidence, saying that the evidence you give will be wholly truthful. Usually, if there is a court recess during your evidence, you would not be asked to swear a new oath on the Bible, but you may be informed that the oath you have already given continues to apply. If you are not a Christian you do not need to use the Bible, but may ask to give an affirmation instead of a religious oath. Muslims may swear by the Koran in some jurisdictions.
oral evidence is using your mouth and talking by using evidence
One way to support a main idea without using numbers is to provide specific examples, anecdotes, or quotes that illustrate the point being made. By using detailed evidence, you can help make your argument more convincing and engaging for the reader.
Christians do not worship using a mat.
From the very beginning - they only had the Old Testament at first and frequently consulted it, especially in regard to the many fulfilled prophecies concerning Jesus Christ the Messiah of Israel.
In the Bible Tyler is the one who tries using one oh Issac son to do things I don't think I should mention but later Tyler was hanged for his actions and was really not mentioned. Most christians do not believe in gayness.
To guess at an answer using some knowledge of the subject but without sufficient evidence to draw a complete conclusion.
It means using text evidence