The Umayyad Caliphate in Damascus reigned from 660 C.E. to 750 C.E. which is a period of 90 years.
The Umayyad Caliphate in Cordoba (which was originally called the Emirate of Cordoba) reigned from 711 C.E. to 1038 C.E., which is a period of 327 years.
no the umayyads ruled damascus as there capital the abbasids took Baghdad as there capital...
because the Umayyads separated themselves from the general islamic populace and surrounded themselves with foreigners.
661-750 AD
The Umayyads are an Arabian tribe that moved from central Arabia to Damascus during the rule of the Caliph Omar to be the leaders of the Damascus Governate. Their authority expanded under Caliph Othman, who was a cousin of the Umayyads.
No. The Umayyads ruled initially from Damascus (660s-750s) until they were overthrown by the Abbassids. Abd er-Rahman re-established the Umayyad Caliphate in Al-Andalus (Islamic Spain) in the city of Córdoba. The Umayyads ruled from this city until the dynasty ended (750s-1030s). However, the Umayyads never ruled from Medina.
No because the group of caliphs the Umayyad ruled from Damascus
Sunni muslims follow the sunnah of Muhammad (peace be upon him), believed that Muhhammad (PHUH) was the last prophet, and accepted the rule of the umayyads. Shi'a muslims sometimes follow the sunnah (way) of Muhammad (PBUH) but didn't accept the rule of the Umayyads and believed only close friends or relatives of Muhammad (PBUH) should and could rule
There is no such group. The Umayyads were supported by the Sunnis because they had temporal power, but the Sunnis never had a requirement that the ruler need be a descendant of the Umayyads; their precondition for having the right to rule was having the power to effectively govern.Perhaps this question confuses the Shiite requirement that a rightful ruler be a descendant of Ali ibn AbuTalib. Ali and the Umayyads were enemies and are in-no-way related.
Umayyads always controlled shia Muslims and kept Imams of shia in prison or killed them. shia Muslims hated Umayyads and always hided their beliefs to be safe from Umayyads security officers.They don't consider them right.
No. Under the Sunni Umayyads, Shiites were quite strongly discriminated against. After Yazid I martyred Hussein, the Shiites made it their mission in life to oppose every action of the Umayyad dynasty. It did not help matters that the Umayyads tortured and murdered Shiite Imams and Infallibles, leading to irreconcilability between the Shiites and the Umayyads.The anger happened specifically because Umayyads targeted Shiites and Mawali Sunnis (Sunnis who were not Arabs) for violence. They also had issues with control over the vast distances of their empire as well as noble Arab families that resented the Umayyads' rise and wanted power. (One of these rival families was the Abbassids, who would eventually take power from the Umayyads in a coup d'etat.)
The Umayyads expanded their empire primarily to the west and north from their capital, Damascus. They extended their territory across North Africa and into the Iberian Peninsula, reaching as far as Spain. Additionally, they expanded eastward into Persia and Central Asia, significantly increasing the extent of their empire during their rule.
Umayyads were the descendants of Umayya whose father was Abd-Shams of the city of Mecca . Abd-Shams was a son of Abd Manaf ibn Qusai. Abd Manaf ibn Qusai had another son by name Hashim whose son was the Prophet Mohammed.