They don't like suffering and try to avoid it. They do not view it as a punishment from god, an atonement for past wrongs, a purification, or leading to a future reward after death.
To respond to suffering from health issues they seek out medical practitioners, for financial suffering they discuss it with bankers and similar, for hunger they eat, for bad interpersonal actions they seek out legal remedies or just move on, for bad haircuts they get another barber.
For suffering in others they provide first aid, call 911, contribute to charity, do social volunteering.
In secular humanism, suffering is viewed as a negative experience that should be minimized or eliminated through rational, evidence-based approaches. Secular humanists emphasize the importance of compassion, empathy, and ethical decision-making to alleviate suffering and promote well-being for individuals and society as a whole. Ultimately, the goal is to address the root causes of suffering and create a more just and humane world.
Many secular humanists are not as intolerant as religious people when it comes to different sexual orientations. Since secular humanists do not follow the religious teachings found in holy books, they are more likely to be tolerant of gay marriage and equal rights for people with different sexual orientations.
It is important to note that a person that holds a secular humanists viewpoint does not retain any specific opinion regarding wealth, however, it is sometimes incorrectly argued that humanists may be less inclined to share their wealth. Generally, secular humanists see money in much the same way as a person of faith. It would be fair to say that secular humanists are no more attracted to an extrinsic lifestyle when compared with other schools of thought. There is no evidence, for example, that a secular humanist would be less likely to use his or her wealth to support the work of charities; In fact there are many secular organisations which do just that.
Secular humanists may view suffering as an inherent part of the human experience that should be ameliorated through reason, compassion, and ethical action. They may emphasize the importance of addressing suffering through scientific and social progress, rather than relying on religious explanations or supernatural interventions. Additionally, they may advocate for greater empathy and support for those experiencing suffering, focusing on human-centered solutions.
Secular humanists typically prioritize reason, ethics, and justice without reliance on the divine or supernatural beliefs, which often distinguishes them from traditional religious frameworks. However, some individuals may identify as secular humanists while still participating in religious communities or practices that align with their values, viewing them as cultural or social rather than spiritual. Ultimately, whether secular humanists can be considered "religious" depends on one's definition of religion and the individual's personal beliefs and practices.
Like anyone else, we aren't evil.
Humanists place humanity as being of primary importance, so human dignity and concerns are what governs their philosophy. From this it is likely that if justice is done, and seen to be done and, as far as possible, human dignity is respected humanists would respond favourably.
With outrage, like any human should.
Secular humanists generally approach marijuana from a perspective that emphasizes reason, individual autonomy, and evidence-based policies. They often support the legalization and regulation of marijuana, advocating for its use in a manner that respects personal freedom while considering health and social implications. Additionally, secular humanists may focus on the importance of scientific research regarding marijuana's effects and potential benefits, promoting informed choices rather than moralistic or punitive approaches.
Christian humanists differed from Italian Renaissance humanists primarily in their focus on integrating classical learning with Christian principles. While Italian humanists emphasized secular themes and the study of ancient texts to promote individualism and civic virtue, Christian humanists sought to reform society through a return to the moral teachings of the Bible. They aimed to apply humanist ideas to improve spirituality and ethics within Christianity, as exemplified by figures like Erasmus and Thomas More. This blend of humanism with religious reform set them apart from their more secular Italian counterparts.
Most Secular Humanists and other Atheists view family as one of the key institutions to creating a functional society and engendering peace and tranquility among people. Family bonds are based in love, trust, hope, and reciprocal good treatment. These are things worth nourishing and protecting. However, Secular Humanists and other Atheists see families as worthy of dissolution in those cases where family members cannot, after persistent attempts, have a cordial or functional relationship. They support divorce or estrangement in these unfortunate circumstances.
Christian humanists focused on applying humanist principles to Christianity, emphasizing the study of classical texts to improve religious understanding and morality. Italian Renaissance humanists, however, were more interested in reviving classical culture and literature, placing emphasis on secular knowledge and the pursuit of individual potential.