Traditional beliefs are often based on superstition and supernatural description of phenomena in the world, typically with little or no basis in fact and often inconsistent with any reasonable explanation (even inconsistent with itself).
Scientific knowledge on the other hand, is based on a natural, consistent and rational process entirely dependent on the evidence and facts observable in existence, constantly improving both itself and the state of knowledge obtained thereof.
Despite what some prefer to believe, science does not carry any "philosophical conclusions" nor is it a "faith position". Science is developed entirely from what can be reliably determined from the universe and its contents, without commenting on society or life beyond the basic mechanics. Traditional beliefs are quite the opposite, usually built around a specific worldview and with intruding themselves onto every aspect of every society, culture and people they come into contact with.
Put simply, the two are almost polar opposites: one depends on subjective interpretation, the other on objective reality (or the nearest approximation therein attainable).
How scientific principles and superstitious beliefs contradict
How scientific principles and superstitious beliefs contradict
The scientific method is systematic and involves formulating hypotheses, conducting experiments, and making observations to test these hypotheses. In contrast, the traditional way of seeking knowledge often relies on beliefs, authorities, or tradition without following a rigorous process of hypothesis testing. The scientific method is more likely to lead to objective and reliable conclusions compared to the traditional approach.
An Enlightenment thinker's goal was to promote reason, individual rights, and the advancement of knowledge through scientific inquiry. They sought to challenge traditional beliefs and promote ideas of freedom, democracy, and equality.
It would be impolite to contradict your teacher.
Yes, the Wife of Bath in Chaucer's "The Canterbury Tales" challenges misogynistic views by expressing her strong opinions on women's autonomy and sexual agency. She uses her personal experiences and storytelling to contradict traditional beliefs that devalue women.
they both were changes in history
The Scientific Revolution encouraged scientists and philosophers to question traditional beliefs and seek empirical evidence through observation and experimentation to understand the natural world. It also promoted collaboration and the sharing of information among scholars to advance knowledge collectively.
Scientific heresies refer to beliefs or theories that challenge established scientific consensus or contradict widely accepted scientific principles. These ideas may arise from unconventional interpretations of data, personal beliefs, or cultural influences, often leading to controversy within the scientific community. While some scientific heresies can eventually contribute to new insights or paradigm shifts, many are dismissed as pseudoscience if they lack empirical support or rigorous validation.
Scientific knowledge is distinct from other forms of knowledge in that it is based on empirical evidence, systematic observation, and experimentation. It relies on the scientific method to test hypotheses and theories, leading to reliable and objective conclusions. This sets it apart from other forms of knowledge that may be based on personal beliefs, opinions, or tradition.
It led scientists to question the traditional beliefs about the workings of the universe.
Albert Einstein had a significant impact on his students' understanding of physics and scientific concepts by revolutionizing the field with his theories of relativity and quantum mechanics. His innovative ideas challenged traditional beliefs and inspired a new way of thinking about the universe, leading to advancements in scientific knowledge and understanding.