Determining whether an action is morally permissible or required often involves evaluating the consequences of that action, considering ethical principles such as justice, respect, and harm. Philosophical frameworks like utilitarianism, deontology, or virtue ethics can guide this assessment. Additionally, reflecting on societal norms, personal values, and empathy towards those affected can provide clarity. Ultimately, engaging in critical thinking and dialogue with others can help refine one's moral judgments.
I don't know what permissible means. There you go.
who cites these principles: 1. A person is held morally responsible for any evil effect whichflows from the action directly willed.
I don't know about 'perceived' but they do have an objective role. To morally guide the child and prepare him for independence as an adult.
The time it takes to execute an action after identifying a hazard depends on the individual's reaction time, the complexity of the action required, and the nature of the hazard. In general, the quicker you can recognize a hazard and respond with the appropriate action, the more effective you will be in mitigating the risk.
you should know
Morally you are supposed to go tell them what you now believe to be the truth.
Positive Negative Whatever you believe is right, is right according to act utilitarianism. Act Utilitarianism gives too much freedom No one really knows whether or not their action is going to be morally right or wrong because no one can look into the future No one knows whether an action will be beneficial to others What someone thinks is right may not be right for another individual and so we are unable to know whether our actions are morally right or wrong.
I know a little about project management skills. I would think that at very least you would need to know how to organize any kind of paperwork. That action just makes sense to me.
yes
Hahaha I don't know... I think it is part of the worlds nature that science cannot prove
know
know