Within the reasoning capabilities of mankind and the all to often jump to conclusions without physical support (think missing links here), the theory of evolution being taught today in nearly all schools, is a biological explanation of how creatures have supposedly "evolved" or developed progressively through natural selection and variation (now known as mutation) over eons of time from the tiny cell to the largest creatures on Earth today. What is taught in classrooms is not mere micro evolution which The Bible supports - small changes within a species over time per the environment - but macro evolution, which is the change from one type of creature (say a lizard) to another quite distinct life form (let's say we humans).
Besides the fact that there isn't any hard and viable proof for these intermediary or transitional forms of development occurring in the fossil record, we only need to read most any evolutionary explanation to see that it is full of assumptions. Further, evolution goes against long-standing scientific laws - biogenesis in Biology for example states that life can only come from life - think which came first the chicken or the egg. There is the other problem of 'symbioses' which is one specie needing another totally different specie to live. Think flowers and bees here. How does one live without the other - especially before man? Lastly, consider how all things are perfectly design or engineered in our world. A simple tree according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture states that it provides the cooling affect of a 10 room air conditioner running for 20 hours a day. Now ask yourself if something so well developed happened by mere chance - the random and undirected evolutionary process.
The above has just described how to disprove the 'molecules to man theory' called Evolution with the acronym 'FALSE'above. Some of the above also disproves today's modern compromise of Theistic evolution which is simply the man-made notion that God used macroevolution over eons of time in forming the creatures we see on earth today.
Yes. However, it is possible to PROVE the validity of evolution on an evidential basis.
Evolution is scientific fact. Creation is religious faith masquerading as real science.
They do not believe in evolution; only creation.
Norman D. Newell has written: 'Creation and evolution' -- subject(s): Evolution, Creation
creation because you need something to evolve
similarities
What are the differences between creation and the theory of evolution
Fundamentalists are at odds with the teaching of evolution because they believe it is not compatible with the teaching of creation. They believe the Bible teaches creation.
Frank Lewis Marsh has written: 'Evolution, creation and science' -- subject(s): Religion and science, Evolution, Creation
There is no science about creation. Creation is an unfounded myth with absolutely no evidence to support it. Try asking about evolution instead.
Nevada is pretty evolution friendly when it comes to its science standards. Nevada is also one of the few states that doesn't have a big evolution-creation controversy.
G. J. Keane has written: 'Special creation rediscovered' -- subject(s): Bible and science, Christianity, Creation, Evolution, Religious aspects of Evolution 'Creation rediscovered'