In Israel's neighboring countries (and elsewhere), the kings were all-powerful. They could and did do whatever they pleased. Among the Israelites, however, the king was under the constant scrutiny of God's prophets, who didn't hesitate to criticize him publicly for any misdeed in the sight of God. And, other than for the crime of rebellion, the king couldn't harm any citizen by his own decision. He was obligated by the Torah-procedures like everyone else (Talmud, Sanhedrin 19a).
Bahrain is an island and therefore it has no neighboring countries. However, the King Fahd Causeway connects Bahrain to Saudi Arabia.
Here are three: They had to deal with the temptation of idolatry. They had neighboring countries that were often hostile (see Psalms 83). Their kings exerted a powerful influence over the nation; and when the king wasn't righteous (enough), it was a bane for the entire people.
The Israelites wanted a king because they wanted to be like the other countries. And so they could worship something
The Moabites did not threaten to destroy the Israelites. In fact, the Moabite king, Balak, sought to curse the Israelites through the prophet Balaam but ultimately did not engage in direct conflict against them. Instead, they were more focused on preventing the Israelites from passing through their territory peacefully. Other neighboring groups, such as the Amalekites and Canaanites, posed more direct threats to the Israelites during their journey.
The king of the Israelites when David was a boy was King Saul. Before that, there were no kings in Israel.
This is incorrect. Samuel chose Saul to be the king of the Israelites.
It was king David. (:
Yes, different countries have different ones.
No. Africa is a continent made of different countries.
The Israelites believed a king would help them unite themselves against their enemy, the Philistines.
He was the first king.
sure