No.
Enosh was a son of Seth (Grandson to Adam).
There were two Enoch's:
1. Son of Cain (Grandson to Adam; Genesis 4:17,18)
2. Son of Jared (Genesis 5:18, 21-24; Hebrews 11:5; 12,1)
See attached links for more information on these men.
Adam and Chava (Eve) had many grandchildren, as explicitly stated in Genesis ch. 5 "and he bore sons and daughters" plural.The two grandsons whose name are recorded are Enosh and Enoch (Genesis 4:17 and 4:26).
Adam had sons and daughters, as recorded in Genesis 5:4. The entire genealogy of Adam is not recorded, or at least not preserved. What we do have are the details of only two of Adam and Eve's grandsons. Through Cain they had a grandson named Enoch (not the same Enoch who walked with God). Through Seth, their third son, they had a grandson names Enos.
Cain's eldest son is recorded in Genesis 4:17 as Enoch (not the same Enoch that God later took from the earth).
No, the person named Enoch in Genesis 4 is a son via Cain's line. The Enoch in Genesis 5, from the line of Seth was 'translated' or moved to another place by; God:Genesis 5:24New International Version (NIV)24 Enoch walked faithfully with God; then he was no more, because God took him away.
No. There is no indication that they are.
Yes.
I suppose it depends on your beliefs. The Bible never mentions an Archangel Uriel. As far as I know he is mentioned in the Gnostic book of Enoch, which has never been accepted as scripture. There IS a propghesy of Enoch's mentioned in the Bible, in Jude 14, saying that the Lord would return with ten thousands of His saints, but nothing else mentioned, and there is no reason to accept this as being the same as the gnostic book attributed to Enoch. In case you don't know, 'gnostic' refers to hidden knowledge, knowledge some claim to receive that is outside of the Bible.
The Book of Enoch is not considered part of the biblical canon because it was not included in the official list of sacred texts recognized by most Christian denominations. It is considered apocryphal, meaning it is not considered divinely inspired or authoritative in the same way as the books included in the Bible.
He is the same historical person, but with differring details.
One of the rare consensus opinions of Bible scholars is that no one person wrote the entirety of Psalms.
No, Nathaniel and Bartholomew are not the same person in the Bible. Nathaniel is a disciple of Jesus mentioned in the Gospel of John, while Bartholomew is also a disciple of Jesus mentioned in the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Some scholars believe that Nathaniel and Bartholomew may be the same person, but this is not definitively confirmed in the Bible.
Enoch ( pronounced the same but note spellling) is a character in the Bible, and also a man"s name. Enoch Light was a band leader. Enoch is interesting as he was directly taken up into Heaven, did not earthly die in the usual sense. There are apocryphal writings known as the Book of Enoch, ignored by most theologicans. In a sense he Was or Is, a spiritual being, but was once a man on this Earth. Biblical writings state, there was no man on earth quite like Enoch, implying a special creation. Go ahead and look it up. I don"t see any connection to dolls.