A:I would expect the same standards from a moral religious person as from a moral non-religious person, no less. The one important difference would probably be the person's own assessment of the reason for his morality. The moral religious person is likely to attribute his or her morality to guidance from God; the moral non-religious person is likely to attribute his or her morality to conscience and a desire to do good for others.
manis
No. Natural Law is scientific and universal. The Law of the Ten Commandments is moral law. Natural Law: gravity, e=mc2, and similar. Moral Law: X is wrong, Y is right, and similar.
he is a god
Love.
to the Aid of God.
infinity ward
Infinity
Natural evil is disasters, obstacles, and death by natural causes, whereas moral evil is when evil arises from an intelligent, conscious being such as by humans. Hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, incurable diseases are examples of natural evils. Moral evil is acting, or failing to act in a way that does not support good. If a bullet kills a person it is still the human who pulled the trigger who is to blame, and is therefore a moral evil. Some believe that natural evil is proof against the existence of a higher power such as God. Others believe that natural evil is just a higher power's way of keeping the world in balance through a cycle of life and death.
We should completely except God as King and ruler for eternity.
It depends on your point of view ! Some people claim there is an omnipotent being called God who made everything. Others attribute the creation to science and natural forces.
I'm not exactly sure if it is biblical related but most associate it with eternal ruler which could be like an attribute to god. God is the an eternal leader so being given the name of an attribute to god is a way of respect for god.