Like all matters in Moral Philosophy, there is not a yes or no answer. If one defines their morals through a Consequentialist perspective (e.g. The moral worth of an action is determined by its outcome), then there are several variables one must consider that do not exist at all, or to the same extent, in non-pederast relationships: - The emotional and intellectual development of those in the relationship, are more likely to have a greater difference, thus causing an increased possibility of exploitation and manipulation of the youth. - Depending on the age of the youth and the sexual acts performed (if any at all), physical harm may entail for the youth in the relationship. - Due to the existing social stigma, the psychological and physical health of those in pederast relationships would be in jeopardy, particularly if the subject is in a crucial stage of psychological development. There are more variables to consider; however, in my opinion these are the more important. Of course, in most countries pederasty and paedophilia are illegal, and the definition is dependant on the country's age of consent laws, if they exist.
no
The ancient Greek view of pederasty was that it was an ideal state where an older male mentored a younger male and was considered a rite of passage into adult life. Sexual relationships within pederasty are likely to have varied in accordance with both individual preferences and with local customs or social mores.
He pled guilty to affray.
Just don't get imprisoned, or you'll find out firsthand.
In my opinion it is unethical.
The unethical child was grounded for 2 months.
unethical competition in business?
Unethical and illegal.
It is unethical in itself and dangerous as a precedent.
Unethical. Period.
No. It is unethical and if your therapist does date you he or she is unethical.
An unethical act is an action that is considering unethical or immoral by the general public or a court.eg. Kicking a puppy in the face.