answersLogoWhite

0

Yes the Church should appoint officers to fulfill the needs of the church. Such as, Pastors, Deacons and treasury

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

When was Church of Scotland Offices created?

Church of Scotland Offices was created in 1909.


What are the two scriptural offices of the church?

The two scriptural offices of the church are Pastors and Deacons.


What was the first church to appoint deacons?

Antioch


What does the president appoint?

The President of the United States has the power to appoint many different offices. These include federal judges, ambassadors, cabinet officers, and military leaders.


What should you do with used towels in a hairdressing salon?

You should probably get a nice little hamper to throw them in, then appoint someone to do LAUNDRY every day. That's what the veterinarian offices do, and they never go wrong.


Who did the pope feel should choose the new bishops?

A:Pope Gregory VII claimed what was an innovation in the Church - that the sole right to appoint bishops rested with the pope.


Was the concordat of worms a fair compromise for both the emperor and the church Why or why not?

yes because it gave the church the right to appoint bishops


How many offices in the Baptist church?

Pastor & Deacons.


What is the concordant of worms?

an agreement made in 1122 that gave the Church the ability to appoint bishops .


Who appoints the Bishop in the Catholic religion?

Only the pope can appoint a bishop in the Catholic Church.


What were three main cause of the need to reform the church?

Many village priests married and had families.Such marriages were against Church rulings. Bishops sold postions in the Church a practice called simony. Using the practice of lay investiture kings appointed church bishops.Church reformers believed the Church alone should appoint bishops


Why did Justinian think he had the right to appoint a pope?

Because the Church's own second Council in Constantinople had decided in 550 AD that nothing in the Church could be done or decided if the Emperor did not agree with it; which basically made the Church subject to the Emperor. No-one within the Church had protested when he single-handedly appointed Rome as the supreme See of the Western Catholic Church. So if he could - on the basis of the Second Counsel-decision of the Church itself - appoint Rome as the See of the Pope unopposed, why shouldn't he be able to appoint (or at least be autorized to approve the selection) of the new Pope?