answersLogoWhite

0

book of luke

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How many miracles did Jesus perform in the book of Luke?

Jesus performed 19 miracles in Luke.


Which gospel emphasize Jesus miracles?

All four Gospels contain miracles performed by Jesus.


What places did Jesus do miracle?

As Jesus did many miracles, you can find them mainly in the books of Matthew, Mark , Luke and John.


Did any of the disciples perform any miracles with Jesus?

Although not specifically mentioned, the disciples after being given power and authority from Jesus came back to Jesus rejoicing about the miracles they performed in His name. See Luke 10:17-19


Where in the Bible is Jesus' ministry described?

In the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.


What miracles where performed in Nazareth?

From Jesus no miracles occurred because of the people of Nazareth not believing Jesus was the sent One from God. There was one miracle in Nazareth however and that was when the Holy Spirit overshadowed Mary and she conceived Jesus in her womb (Luke 1:35).


What events are described both at the end of Luke and the beginning of Acts?

Jesus' ascension into heaven


Is there any record for the miracles of Jesus after his resurrection?

The only record that we have and on which we build our faith is "THE HOLLY BIBLE".you can JESUS miracles after His ressurection in:Mathiew 28.Mark 16.luke 24.John 20-21.(specially John 21).Hope it can help you...


What book in the Bible did Jesus do a lot of his healing?

There are 15 healing miracles performed by Jesus recorded in Luke. Matthew records 13, Mark has 12, and John has only 3.


Is it easier to explain Jesus' nature miracles than healing miracles?

Any attempt to explain Jesus' nature miracles or healing miracles starts from the proposition that the gospels are reliable accounts of events that actually happened. Both types of miracles can easily be explained by questioning the reliability of the gospels themselves.Some would say that the existence of four independent accounts demonstrates their reliability, but this argument has been destroyed by the discovery that the Gospels of Matthew, Luke and John were based, directly (Matthew, Luke) or indirectly (John) on Mark's Gospel. Since the reliability of Mark has been placed in doubt, the reliability of the other gospels is also in doubt.


The Gospels that describe the life and miracles of Jesus were recorded in?

The Gospels that describe the life and miracles of Jesus were recorded in the New Testament of the Bible. There are four canonical Gospels: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Each Gospel provides a unique perspective on the life, teachings, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.


Was Paul or any of the authors of the four gospels an eyewitness to Jesus' miracles?

It is undisputed that Paul was not an eyewitness to the miracles that are recorded in the four gospels. Christian tradition hold that the Gospels according to Matthew, Mark and John were written by disciples of that name, who were eyewitnesses to some of the miracles that they reported. Since Christian tradition hold that Luke's Gospel was written by a young companion of Paul, then the author of this gospel was clearly not an eyewitness of the miracles. Matthew's Gospel was written in Greek and clearly used Mark's Gospel as its main source for the life of Jesus, as did Luke's Gospel. This can be shown because whenever Matthew and Luke agree with Mark, the Greek words are almost identical, something that could not have occurred if Matthew was relying on personal memory. Whenever Matthew and Luke agree on sayings of Jesus, that are not in Mark's Gospel, they use identical words for the sayings, but place them in different contexts and even different times of the ministry of Jesus. Scholars say they must have used as their sources a common document of sayings attributed to Jesus, a document now known as the Q Document, and created plausible contexts in which Jesus could have spoken those sayings. The fact that Matthew, as well as Luke, relied so heavily on Mark and the Q Document means that this author could not have been an eye-witness to the miracles. John's Gospel was also written in Greek and shows evidence of borrowing much of its material from Luke's Gospel. Once again, this author could not have been an eye-witness to the miracles. Only the author of Mark's Gospel could have been an eye-witness to the miracles, but much evidence internal to this gospel indicates that he was really writing a second-hand account. In summary, none of these authors was an eye-witness to the miracles.