No. Becoz, This Title/Person Belongs to Bengali/Hindu Barendra (Srostriyo) Brahmin.
Because the Hebraism "son of" can mean physical offspring of as in a future descendant but it can also mean one who is like another....David was a King and a Prophet and a Shepherd and a Judge, and so on, his goal was the unity of all God's people...these are roles ascribed to Messiah...
the son of David
I don't understand what your question is.
David Cameron's son had Epilepsy
A Son of David was created in 1920-02.
David Cameron belongs to the Church of England (Anglican)
Solomon, not David, had a son Rehoboam, who had a son named Abijam. this is in 1 Kings 14:31.
If Jesus was the messiah the first question asked would be "is he of the house of David?" Any claim to be the Messiah would have to pass this genealogical test. Every devout Jew knew that the Messiah would come from the lineage of David. So Matthew traces Christ's genealogy through the royal line of David. The title 'son of David' also links Jesus with humanity.
Use "son's" when referring to something that belongs to one son. Use "sons'" when referring to something that belongs to multiple sons. For example, "My son's toy is on the floor" (one son), or "The sons' room needs to be cleaned" (multiple sons).
It belongs to the other person on the title.
King David wept for the son that Bathsheba had and for Absalom.