I am not certain, but I believe that he was not authorized officially, but that was part of his radical-ness. He didn't do the typical Jewish ways and that was what people either loved him for or hated him for. But ultimately, Jesus was preaching the good news of truth, and what he said will come true.
No they were not priests at all. As the temple was not there then.
priests
the priests throw you out
Sadducces
The priests of the Old Testament worked in the temple taking care of the sacrifices and the temple itself. When the Israelites were wondering in the desert the high priests were the only people who could carry the ark of the covenant.
The conflict between the temple priests and Fleete is resolved when Fleete is able to prove his innocence and the priests realize they were mistaken in accusing him. They come to a mutual understanding and reach a resolution that satisfies both parties.
earkiest government were controlled by the temple priests
The three different types of pharaohs are: >Tut (Tutankhamun) >Rameses II >Rameses III I hope I helped you :)
The Kohenim (priests), however, they weren't leaders of the Jewish people, they were in charge of the Temple.
Yes, Coptic Orthodox Priests have to get married before they become priests. becomes they take confession from other people. that help a lot to get them down. A lot of Egyptian priests they very close to God and they don't have sex even with their wives they only pray to Jesus.
There have not been Jewish Priests since the destruction of the Second Temple.
The temple priests let the British intruders go to avoid conflict and preserve the sanctity of the temple. They may have believed that taking a stand could lead to violence or desecration of their sacred space. Additionally, the priests might have hoped that by showing mercy, they could foster a sense of goodwill or negotiate better terms for the temple's autonomy. Ultimately, their decision reflects a complex interplay of faith, diplomacy, and the desire to protect their religious heritage.